PDC Course Evaluation for PDC 305: Direct Reading Instruments for Students and Young Professionals – NEW!

Deadline: Fri, 6/14

* - indicates a required item.

1. * Did you attend this PDC in-person or virtually?: In-person; Virtually
2. * Please rate your overall satisfaction with the following:: 1 - Very Dissatisfied 2 - Dissatisfied 3 - Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied 4 - Satisfied 5 - Very Satisfied
   Pace of the Course
   Organization of the course content
   Usefulness of the information presented
   Instructional methods (lectures, demonstrations, discussion, simulations, etc.)
   Course assessment methods for transfer of knowledge (hands-on, demonstrations, group activities, workshops, etc.)
   Course materials (handouts, workbooks, slides, etc.)
   Course achieved the advertised learning outcomes
   Information covered was appropriate to the advertised course level (introductory, intermediate, or advanced)
3. This course increased my understanding of the topic area:: YesNo
4. This course should continue to be offered:: YesNo
5. * Please share any additional comments about the PDC: (if none, enter “N/A”. Please note that we often use quotes listed here in promotional material. Please provide your name, if you would like to be quoted)
1. Please rank the speaker on the following:: N/A 1 - Poor 2 - Less than Average 3 - Average 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent
   Technical Knowledge
   Speaking Ability
   Willingness and Ability to Answer Questions
2. Please share any additional comments about the speaker: (if none, enter “N/A”. Please keep a professional tone and provide constructive feedback since presenters will be able to view your comments exactly as written. Include your name and email address if you are requesting follow-up.
1. Please rank the speaker on the following:: N/A 1 - Poor 2 - Less than Average 3 - Average 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent
   Technical Knowledge
   Speaking Ability
   Willingness and Ability to Answer Questions
2. Please share any additional comments about the speaker: (if none, enter “N/A”. Please keep a professional tone and provide constructive feedback since presenters will be able to view your comments exactly as written. Include your name and email address if you are requesting follow-up.
1. Please rank the speaker on the following:: N/A 1 - Poor 2 - Less than Average 3 - Average 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent
   Technical Knowledge
   Speaking Ability
   Willingness and Ability to Answer Questions
2. Please share any additional comments about the speaker: (if none, enter “N/A”. Please keep a professional tone and provide constructive feedback since presenters will be able to view your comments exactly as written. Include your name and email address if you are requesting follow-up.
1. Please rank the speaker on the following:: N/A 1 - Poor 2 - Less than Average 3 - Average 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent
   Technical Knowledge
   Speaking Ability
   Willingness and Ability to Answer Questions
2. Please share any additional comments about the speaker: (if none, enter “N/A”. Please keep a professional tone and provide constructive feedback since presenters will be able to view your comments exactly as written. Include your name and email address if you are requesting follow-up.

PDC Course Evaluation for PDC 305: Direct Reading Instruments for Students and Young Professionals – NEW!

Instructor evaluation: Jun Wang, PhD, CIH, CSP

Instructor evaluation: Spencer Pizzani

Instructor evaluation: Nicholas Caravello, BS

Lead Instructor evaluation: Emanuele Cauda

	1 - Very Dissatisfied	2 - Dissatisfied	3 - Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied	4 - Satisfied	5 - Very Satisfied
Pace of the Course
Organization of the course content
Usefulness of the information presented
Instructional methods (lectures, demonstrations, discussion, simulations, etc.)
Course assessment methods for transfer of knowledge (hands-on, demonstrations, group activities, workshops, etc.)
Course materials (handouts, workbooks, slides, etc.)
Course achieved the advertised learning outcomes
Information covered was appropriate to the advertised course level (introductory, intermediate, or advanced)

	N/A	1 - Poor	2 - Less than Average	3 - Average	4 - Very Good	5 - Excellent
Technical Knowledge
Speaking Ability
Willingness and Ability to Answer Questions