Research Roundups Evaluation for O1: Research Roundup Sampling and Analysis 3

Deadline: Fri, 6/14

* - indicates a required item.

* Please use the following scale to rate the session:: 1 - Very Dissatisfied 2 - Dissatisfied 3 - Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied 4 - Satisfied 5 - Very Satisfied
   Presentation Content: interactive, informative, and relevant
   Organization: well-planned session, speakers followed advertised schedule
   Description: session presented matched advertised description
   Learning Levels: session presented matched advertised learning levels
   Commercialism: session was not a sales pitch and did not promote a specific vendor, product, or service
Overall Comments: (Anything you’d like to share about the session) *Please keep a professional tone and provide constructive feedback since presenters will be able to view your comments exactly as written. Include your name and email address if you are requesting follow-up.
Please complete the rating for each speaker.: N/A 1 - Poor 2 - Less than Average 3 - Average 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent
   Technical knowledge
   Speaking ability
   Willingness & ability to answer questions
Please share any additional comments about the speaker: (if none, enter “N/A”) *Please keep a professional tone and provide constructive feedback since presenters will be able to view your comments exactly as written. Include your name and email address if you are requesting follow-up.
Please complete the rating for each speaker.: N/A 1 - Poor 2 - Less than Average 3 - Average 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent
   Technical knowledge
   Speaking ability
   Willingness & ability to answer questions
Please share any additional comments about the speaker: (if none, enter “N/A”) *Please keep a professional tone and provide constructive feedback since presenters will be able to view your comments exactly as written. Include your name and email address if you are requesting follow-up.

Research Roundups Evaluation for O1: Research Roundup Sampling and Analysis 3

Author evaluation: Charles Manning, PhD, CIH, FAIHA

Author evaluation: Maria Peralta, PhD

	1 - Very Dissatisfied	2 - Dissatisfied	3 - Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied	4 - Satisfied	5 - Very Satisfied
Presentation Content: interactive, informative, and relevant
Organization: well-planned session, speakers followed advertised schedule
Description: session presented matched advertised description
Learning Levels: session presented matched advertised learning levels
Commercialism: session was not a sales pitch and did not promote a specific vendor, product, or service

	N/A	1 - Poor	2 - Less than Average	3 - Average	4 - Very Good	5 - Excellent
Technical knowledge
Speaking ability
Willingness & ability to answer questions