Research Roundup Evaluation for J1: Research Roundup Total Worker Health® 2

* - indicates a required item.
Please use the following scale to rate the session:
 1 - Very Dissatisfied2 - Dissatisfied3 - Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied4 - Satisfied5 - Very Satisfied
   Presentation Content: interactive, informative, and relevant
   Organization: well-planned session, speakers followed advertised schedule
   Description: session presented matched advertised description and/or learning objectives
   Content Level: session presented matched advertised content level (Introductory, Intermediate, Advanced)
   Commercialism: session was not a sales pitch and did not promote a specific vendor, product, or service
Was the Targeted Audience (IH/OH Practice Level) designated appropriately? If you feel that this proposal is listed under the wrong target audience, select “no” and type in the audience you feel is best suited for this submission (technician, practitioner, professional)”

Enter correct Target Audience
How accurate was the core competency classification for this session?






Please use the following scale to rate the session:
 1 - Very Dissatisfied2 - Dissatisfied3 - Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied4 - Satisfied5 - Very Satisfied
   How satisfied are you with the design and organization of the session such that it enabled your full participation?
   How well did the session’s interactive elements support your learning as an adult learner (e.g., Q&A)?
   How satisfied are you with the visual design and readability of the presentation slides and any handouts? (font size, contrast, layout, images)
Please share any specific experiences with how the design and/or organization of the session made it difficult for you to fully participate. (Optional and anonymous, brief comments welcome).
Optional: What could be improved to better support how adults learn in this session?
Optional: If you experienced any difficulty, what could be improved?
The examples, language, and session materials were respectful?





What factors contributed to you choosing to attend this session?





Overall Comments: (Anything you’d like to share about the session)
Please keep a professional tone and provide constructive feedback since presenters will be able to view your comments exactly as written. Include your name and email address if you are requesting follow-up.

Author evaluation: Jennifer Cavallari, ScD, CIH

J1a: A Participatory Program to Address Stress in Educators
Please complete the rating for each speaker.
 N/A1 - Poor2 - Less than Average3 - Average4 - Very Good5 - Excellent
   Technical knowledge
(Demonstrated understanding and accurate presentation of the topic)
   Speaking ability
(Spoke clearly, engaged the audience, and used visuals effectively)
   Willingness & ability to answer questions
(Allowed time for questions and responded clearly and completely)
Overall Comments: (Anything you’d like to share about the speaker)