Education Pop-Up Evaluation for EPU2: OEHS Engagement Roadmap for Navigating Stewardship and Sustainability

* - indicates a required item.

* Please use the following scale to rate the session:: 1 - Very Dissatisfied 2 - Dissatisfied 3 - Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied 4 - Satisfied 5 - Very Satisfied
   Presentation Content: interactive, informative, and relevant
   Description: session presented matched advertised description and/or learning objectives
   Organization: well-planned session, speakers followed advertised schedule
   Content Level: session presented matched advertised content level (Introductory, Intermediate, Advanced)
   Commercialism: session was not a sales pitch and did not promote a specific vendor, product, or service
* Was the Targeted Audience (IH/OH Practice Level) designated appropriately? If you feel that this proposal is listed under the wrong target audience, select “no” and type in the audience you feel is best suited for this submission (technician, practitioner, professional): YesNo
Enter correct Target Audience
* How accurate was the core competency classification for this session?: 0 - Not sure; 1 - Not accurate; 2 - Slightly accurate; 3 - Somewhat accurate; 4 - Mostly accurate; 5 - Very accurate
* Please use the following scale to rate the session:: 1 - Very Dissatisfied 2 - Dissatisfied 3 - Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied 4 - Satisfied 5 - Very Satisfied
   How satisfied were you with the design and organization of the session in supporting your ability to participate fully?
   How well did the session’s interactive elements support your learning as an adult learner (e.g., opportunities to apply concepts, participate actively, and learn from discussion)?
   How satisfied are you with visual design and readability of the presentation slides and any handouts? (font size, contrast, layout, images)
Please share any specific experiences with how the design and/or organization of the session made it difficult for you to fully participate. (Optional and anonymous, brief comments welcome)
Optional: What could be improved to better support how adults learn in this session?
Optional: If you experienced any difficulty, what could be improved?
* The examples, language, and session materials were respectful?: 1 - Strongly Disagree; 2 - Disagree; 3 - Neither Agree or Disagree; 4 - Agree; 5 - Strongly Agree
* What factors contributed to choosing to attend this session? (Choose all that apply): The speaker(s); The listed Core Competency; The title of the session; The description and/or learning objectives; The day/time; Other:
Overall Comments: (Anything you’d like to share about the session) *Please keep a professional tone and provide constructive feedback since presenters will be able to view your comments exactly as written. Include your name and email address if you are requesting follow-up.
Please complete the rating for each speaker.: N/A 1 - Poor 2 - Less than Average 3 - Average 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent
   Technical knowledge
(Demonstrated understanding and accurate presentation of the topic)
   Speaking ability
(Spoke clearly, engaged the audience, and used visuals effectively)
   Willingness & ability to answer questions
(Allowed time for questions and responded clearly and completely)
Please share any additional comments about the speaker: (if none, enter “N/A”) *Please keep a professional tone and provide constructive feedback since presenters will be able to view your comments exactly as written. Include your name and email address if you are requesting follow-up.
Please complete the rating for each speaker.: N/A 1 - Poor 2 - Less than Average 3 - Average 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent
   Technical knowledge
(Demonstrated understanding and accurate presentation of the topic)
   Speaking ability
(Spoke clearly, engaged the audience, and used visuals effectively)
   Willingness & ability to answer questions
(Allowed time for questions and responded clearly and completely)
Please share any additional comments about the speaker: (if none, enter “N/A”) *Please keep a professional tone and provide constructive feedback since presenters will be able to view your comments exactly as written. Include your name and email address if you are requesting follow-up.

Education Pop-Up Evaluation for EPU2: OEHS Engagement Roadmap for Navigating Stewardship and Sustainability

Pop-up Co-Presenter evaluation: Laura Allen, MS, CIH

Pop-up Presenter evaluation: Weston DuBose, MPH, CIH

	1 - Very Dissatisfied	2 - Dissatisfied	3 - Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied	4 - Satisfied	5 - Very Satisfied
Presentation Content: interactive, informative, and relevant
Description: session presented matched advertised description and/or learning objectives
Organization: well-planned session, speakers followed advertised schedule
Content Level: session presented matched advertised content level (Introductory, Intermediate, Advanced)
Commercialism: session was not a sales pitch and did not promote a specific vendor, product, or service

	N/A	1 - Poor	2 - Less than Average	3 - Average	4 - Very Good	5 - Excellent
Technical knowledge (Demonstrated understanding and accurate presentation of the topic)
Speaking ability (Spoke clearly, engaged the audience, and used visuals effectively)
Willingness & ability to answer questions (Allowed time for questions and responded clearly and completely)

	1 - Very Dissatisfied	2 - Dissatisfied	3 - Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied	4 - Satisfied	5 - Very Satisfied
How satisfied were you with the design and organization of the session in supporting your ability to participate fully?
How well did the session’s interactive elements support your learning as an adult learner (e.g., opportunities to apply concepts, participate actively, and learn from discussion)?
How satisfied are you with visual design and readability of the presentation slides and any handouts? (font size, contrast, layout, images)