Register Now

F1: Research Roundup Exposure Assessment

Ryan Hines, CIH Moderator
Johns Hopkins University
Towson, MD 
USA
 
Thomas Hawkinson, MS, CIH, CSP Author
Stantec Consulting Services
Chandler, AZ 
United States of America
 
Greg Richey, CIH, CSP, FAIHA Author
Colden Corporation
Blue Bell, PA 
United States of America
 
Tue, 6/2: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM CDT
Research Roundups 
Ernest N. Morial New Orleans Convention Center 
Room: 293 
CM Credit Hours:

Content Level

Intermediate

Core Competencies

Exposure Assessment
Health Regulations
Work Environments, Occupations, and Industrial Processes

Session Availability

In-person
OnDemand
Virtual

Targeted Audience

Professional

Transfer of Knowledge

Case Studies
Lecture Only

Presentations

F1a: Silica in Mining New Standard and Sampling Issues

The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) finalized a rule to enhance protections for miners against respirable crystalline silica, a known health hazard linked to severe illnesses. The rule, titled "Lowering Miners' Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica and Improving Respiratory Protection," updates outdated standards to align with current occupational health practices and the OSHA requirements for General Industry and Construction. The MSHA silica rule introduces a uniform permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³) for an 8-hour time-weighted average across all mining sectors, replacing varied limits based on mine type. An action level of 25 µg/m³ triggers additional monitoring. Operators must implement feasible engineering controls, supplemented by administrative controls, to maintain exposures below the PEL or provide miners with respiratory protection if that is infeasible. The rule addresses a critical health issue, as silica exposure contributes to a 400% increase in lung transplants for black lung disease since 2016, with 1 in 5 Appalachian miners affected.

This study discusses the sampling issues with methods that provide an acceptable ISO compliant respirable sample, appropriate choice of sampling train, the affects of humidity and the interference of other materials not covered by the standard in the ore body. We will also cover some logistical issues with mining overloading analytic labs to comply with the standard. 

Co-Authors

K. Bosch, Stantec Consulting, Minneapolis, MN, USA, A. Birkbeck, Stantec Consulting, Denver, CO, USA, Scott Maxey, Stantec Consulting , Denver, CO, USA 

Acknowledgements & References

None 

Author

Thomas Hawkinson, MS, CIH, CSP, Stantec Consulting Services Chandler, AZ 
United States of America

F1b: Metal Exposures in Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing

Metal additive manufacturing is transforming industry but introduces unique occupational health risks. Although the laser powder bed fusion process is enclosed, exposures can occur during powder handling, cleaning, and post-processing.

This case study presents three industrial hygiene evaluations at facilities using nickel, cobalt, chromium, and titanium-based alloys. Personal and area air monitoring, metal profiling, and particulate logging were performed under worst-case conditions. At one facility, exposures were below OSHA limits, but nickel exceeded ACGIH thresholds for technicians who vacuumed parts and machines during the workday. At a second facility, a technician who hand-sieved powders exposure exceeded OELs for nickel, cobalt, and iron. Key lessons emphasize the impact of work practices, the effectiveness of HVAC filtration, and the importance of respiratory protection in controlling risk and safeguarding worker health. 

Co-Authors

Catherine Bobenhausen, MS CIH, CSP, FAIHA 

Acknowledgements & References

C. Bobenhausen, Colden Corporation, New York, NY, USA 

Author

Greg Richey, CIH, CSP, FAIHA, Colden Corporation Blue Bell, PA 
United States of America