Affective Response Modeling Leveraging EEG and Deep Learning Toward Mental Health Assessment

Poster No:

1681 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Woojae Jeong1, Takfarinas Medani1, Hamzeh Alturk2, Colin McDaniel2, Idan Blank3, Dani Byrd4, Assal Habibi2, Baruch Cahn2, Shrikanth Narayanan1, Richard Leahy1

Institutions:

1Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 3Department of Psychology and Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 4Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

First Author:

Woojae Jeong  
Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA

Co-Author(s):

Takfarinas Medani  
Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA
Hamzeh Alturk  
Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA
Colin McDaniel  
Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA
Idan Blank  
Department of Psychology and Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA
Dani Byrd  
Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA
Assal Habibi  
Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA
Baruch Cahn  
Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA
Shrikanth Narayanan  
Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA
Richard Leahy  
Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA

Introduction:

Mental health is critical in determining one's overall health, quality of life, and functional status. After the COVID-19 pandemic, we witnessed a significant increase in the global prevalence of depression and suicide rates [1]. Accurate and timely assessment of depression and suicide risk is one the most effective ways to support mental healthcare. Current methods for assessing individual mental health and potential risk factors predominantly rely on self-reports or behavioral interviews through questionnaires. However, these approaches are often incomplete and unreliable. With advances in neuroscience and machine learning, recent studies have shown promising results in emotion recognition with high accuracy by decoding distinctive features from emotionally evoked electroencephalogram (EEG) time-frequency representations using different convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures [2, 3]. Here, we seek to develop a reliable means to objectively assess and classify mental states by identifying biomarkers from EEG signals evoked by four different emotional stimuli in an Emotional Strop paradigm using deep neural networks and machine learning classifiers.

Methods:

Participants were pre-screened and grouped into control, depressed, and suicide risk groups based on their performance on PHQ-9 [4] and SIS (Suicidal Ideation Scale) scores [5]. Participants were asked to perform an Emotional Stroop task [6] with four groups of 60 emotional stimuli words related to happy, neutral, sad, and suicidality designed and developed to trigger an emotional response. Participants were to identify the color of the word while instructed to ignore the meaning of the word. Differential interference in color by emotional versus neutral words implicates excess attention deployed to stimuli related to underlying emotional processing, taking attentional resources away from color identification. We collected EEG using a 64-channel active electrode system (Brain Products) sampled at 1 kHz. The EEG signal was preprocessed using the standard Brainstorm pipelines [7]. We performed a preliminary analysis of the behavioral data and event-related potential (ERP) on data from 31 participants (healthy control: 17, depressed: 8, suicide risk: 6). We computed the average reaction time (time from stimulus onset to the participant's response) for each emotional category in each group. The ERP was computed by averaging across trials for each emotional category and averaged across the 9 selected channels in the fronto-central area, where we expected to capture signals originating from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC) and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) [8].

Results:

The overall reaction time of the healthy control group showed a faster trend than the depressed and the suicide risk groups (Figure 1). Our preliminary analysis suggests that, in comparison to the healthy control group, which exhibits similar neural responses to both affective and non-affective stimuli, the neural processing in response to affective stimuli appears to differ in the groups with depression and suicidal tendencies (Figure 2).
Supporting Image: Figure1.png
   ·Figure 1. Average reaction time for each group and emotional category.
Supporting Image: Figure2.png
   ·Figure 2. Average ERP from fronto-central channels (red dots in the topography) for each group and emotional category.
 

Conclusions:

Our initial findings indicate that the emotionally aroused neural responses exhibit distinct characteristics across different groups both on reaction time and the underlying neural mechanisms, although larger samples will be required to verify statistical significance. We aim to collect 150 participants (control: 74, depressed: 38, suicide risk 38) and extend our analysis of these subjects. Future analysis will include extracting discriminative underlying features from the EEG time-frequency representations at the source level [7, 9, 10] by a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) [2]. By employing this approach, we aim to deepen our understanding of the neural responses that underlie different mental states and elaborate our capability to assess mental health with greater objectivity.

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Classification and Predictive Modeling 2
EEG/MEG Modeling and Analysis 1

Keywords:

Computational Neuroscience
Computing
Consciousness
Data analysis
Design and Analysis
Electroencephaolography (EEG)
Emotions
Machine Learning

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

[1] Panchal, N., Kamal, R., Orgera, K., Cox, C., Garfield, R., Hamel, L., and Chidambaram, P. (2020), ‘The implications of COVID-19 for mental health and substance use’, Kaiser family foundation, 21, 1-16.

[2] Zali-Vargahan, B., Charmin, A., Kalbkhani, H., and Barghandan, S. (2023), ‘Deep time-frequency features and semi-supervised dimension reduction for subject-independent emotion recognition from multi-channel EEG signals’, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 85, 104806.

[3] Khare, S. K., and Bajaj, V. (2020), ‘Time-frequency representations and convolutional neural network-based emotion recognition’, IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems’, 32(7), 2901-2909.

[4] Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., and Williams, J. B. (2001), ‘The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure’, Journal of general internal medicine’, 16(9), 606-613.

[5] Rudd, M. D. (1989), ‘The prevalence of suicidal ideation among college students’, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 19, 173-183.

[6] Wells, A., Mathews, G. (1996), ‘Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: the S-REF model’, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 881-888.

[7] Tadel, F., Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., Pantazis, D., and Leahy, R. M. (2011), ‘Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis’, Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 1-13.

[8] Ergen, M., Saban, S., Kirmizi-Alsan, E., Uslu, A., Keskin-Ergen, Y., and Demiralp, T. (2014), ‘Time-frequency analysis of the event-related potentials associated with the Stroop test’, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94(3), 463-472.

[9] Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., and Leahy, R. M. (2001), ‘Electromagnetic brain mapping’, IEEE Signal processing magazine, 18(6), 14-30.

[10] Mosher, J. C., Leahy, R. M., and Lewis, P. S. (1999), ‘EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods’, IEEE Transactions on biomedical engineering, 46(3), 245-259.