Hydra Nordic: A thermal-noise removal strategy for multi-echo fMRI

Poster No:

1698 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Marco Flores-Coronado1, Cesar Caballero-Gaudes2

Institutions:

1Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Donostia-San Sebastián, Guipuzkoa, 2Basque Center of Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastián, Spain

First Author:

Marco Flores-Coronado  
Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language
Donostia-San Sebastián, Guipuzkoa

Co-Author:

Cesar Caballero-Gaudes  
Basque Center of Cognition, Brain and Language
San Sebastián, Spain

Introduction:

During MRI acquisition, artifacts (e.g., body movement, and respiratory effects)(Satterthwaite et al., 2019) and noise sources (e.g., thermal noise from the scanners)(Wald & Polimeni, 2017) hinder signal fidelity. Multi-echo fMRI techniques (ME), in turn, have demonstrated superior data quality compared to conventional single-echo acquisitions. ME combines signals from different echo times (TEs) to amplify the contrast-to-noise ratio(Poser et al., 2006). Complementing this, multi-echo independent component analysis (ME-ICA) refines signal quality by removing components that do not follow BOLD assumptions(Community et al., 2023; DuPre et al., 2021; Kundu et al., 2017). Additionally, Nordic has emerged as an effective method in reducing thermal noise during single-echo acquisition(Vizioli et al., 2021). Yet, an integrated approach leveraging the advantages of both ME and Nordic remains unformulated. Here, we investigate the optimal use of thermal-noise reduction using Nordic and ME-based techniques (e.g., optimal combination and ME-ICA). Our proposed method, named Hydra Nordic, explores the simultaneous use of these techniques for an enhancement in signal quality.

Methods:

Five healthy volunteers (3 women) were scanned in a 3T Siemens PrimaFit MAGNETOM MR scanner using a 64-channel head at the Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language. Multi-echo fMRI data was collected during two resting state runs with different voxel resolutions (2.4 mm isotropic voxels: TR=1.2s, TE= 11.2/28.1/45/61.9 ms, and 2 mm isotropic voxels: TR=1.7s, TE=13.4/36.1/58.8/81.5 ms, both runs with SMS=5, GRAPPA=2, 65/75 whole-head sagittal slices respectively). Single-band reference (SBRef) images were acquired for each TE. T1-weighted MP2RAGE and T2-weighted Turbo Spin Echo images were collected at 1 mm voxel resolution in each subject. ME-fMRI data was minimally preprocessed with AFNI, including the removal of the 10 first volumes to achieve a steady-state magnetization, image realignment of the first echo to the SBRef and applying this transformation to the other echoes, and T2*-weighed linear (optimal) combination of the echoes using TEDANA (ME-OC). Before this standard ME-fMRI preprocessing, two versions of the Nordic denoising approach were also applied to reduce thermal noise: applying Nordic to each echo dataset independently (NORDIC-OC), and applying Nordic on the spatial concatenated dataset (3dZcat) from all the echoes and then separating them (3dZcutup) for subsequent preprocessing (HYDRA-OC). Both Nordic approaches used the noise-only scans (i.e., no RF excitation) acquired at the end of each run to estimate the hyper-parameters of the Nordic algorithm. Temporal signal-to-noise ratio (TSNR) maps (i.e. voxelwise mean divided by its standard deviation) were computed on the ME-OC, NORDIC-OC and HYDRA-OC datasets. We hypothesize that reducing thermal noise from echoes simultaneously would better capture thermal noise because we assume it to be similar between echoes

Results:

Temporal Signal-to-Noise Ratio (T-SNR) maps were computed from OC maps -TSNR=mean(OC)/sd(OC)- As previously reported, we found that Nordic reduced overall signal variance. Moreover, we found an positive increase in overall tSNR values between HYDRA-OC TSRN values as compared both to ME-OC, and NORDIC-OC. In FIgure 1, scatterplots from a representative subject show a positive increment in overall TSNR values (2.4mm isotropic voxel). In FIgure 2, scatter plots from the same individual inform that with lower voxel size, there is a greater increment in TSNR values between methods.
Supporting Image: OHBM_figure2.jpg
   ·FIgure 2. Scatterplots comparing hydra OC tsnr values (y-axis), against Nordic OC (left x-axis) and OC (right x-axis) with a 2 mm isotropic voxel
Supporting Image: OHBM_figure1.jpg
   ·FIgure 1. Scatterplots comparing hydra OC tsnr values (y-axis), against Nordic OC (left x-axis) and OC (right x-axis) with a 2.4 mm isotropic voxel
 

Conclusions:

We argue that, concatenating the echo-time-series volumes let us better approach the thermal noise distribution. Furthermore, me found evidence that such estimation improves if voxel size decrease.

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Exploratory Modeling and Artifact Removal 1
Methods Development 2

Keywords:

FUNCTIONAL MRI
Workflows
Other - signal cleaning

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

Community, T. tedana, Ahmed, Z., Bandettini, P. A., Bottenhorn, K. L., Caballero-Gaudes, C., Dowdle, L. T., DuPre, E., Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Handwerker, D., Heunis, S., Kundu, P., Laird, A. R., Markello, R., Markiewicz, C. J., Maullin-Sapey, T., Moia, S., Molfese, P., Salo, T., Staden, I., … Whitaker, K. (2023). ME-ICA/tedana: 23.0.1 (23.0.1) [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7926293
DuPre, E., Salo, T., Ahmed, Z., Bandettini, P., Bottenhorn, K., Caballero-Gaudes, C., Dowdle, L., Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Heunis, S., Kundu, P., Laird, A., Markello, R., Markiewicz, C., Moia, S., Staden, I., Teves, J., Uruñuela, E., Vaziri-Pashkam, M., Whitaker, K., & Handwerker, D. (2021). TE-dependent analysis of multi-echo fMRI with tedana. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(66), 3669. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03669
Kundu, P., Voon, V., Balchandani, P., Lombardo, M. V., Poser, B. A., & Bandettini, P. A. (2017). Multi-echo fMRI: A review of applications in fMRI denoising and analysis of BOLD signals. NeuroImage, 154, 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.033
Poser, B. A., Versluis, M. J., Hoogduin, J. M., & Norris, D. G. (2006). BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: Parallel-acquired inhomogeneity-desensitized fMRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 55(6), 1227–1235. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20900
Satterthwaite, T. D., Ciric, R., Roalf, D. R., Davatzikos, C., Bassett, D. S., & Wolf, D. H. (2019). Motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity: Characteristics and mitigation strategies. Human Brain Mapping, 40(7), 2033–2051. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23665
Vizioli, L., Moeller, S., Dowdle, L., Akçakaya, M., De Martino, F., Yacoub, E., & Uğurbil, K. (2021). Lowering the thermal noise barrier in functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Nature Communications, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25431-8
Wald, L. L., & Polimeni, J. R. (2017). Impacting the effect of fMRI noise through hardware and acquisition choices – Implications for controlling false positive rates. NeuroImage, 154, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.057