Functional connectivity reorganization over age and Alzheimer’s disease

Presented During:

Wednesday, June 26, 2024: 11:30 AM - 12:45 PM
COEX  
Room: Grand Ballroom 103  

Poster No:

282 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Jonathan Rittmo1, Laura Wisse2, Olof Strandberg3, Nicola Spotorno3, Hamid Behjat3, Danielle van Westen4, Sebastian Pamqvist3, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren3, Shorena Janelidze5, Erik Stomrud3, Theodore Satterthwaite6, Hansson Oskar3, Jacob Vogel7

Institutions:

1Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, SciLifeLab, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 3Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund Univ, Lund, Sweden, 4Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, Lund, Sweden, 5Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of MediLund University, Lund, Sweden, 6Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Philadelphia, PA, United States, Philadelphia, PA, 7Lund UniversityDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, SciLifeLab, Lund Universi, Lund, Sweden

First Author:

Jonathan Rittmo  
Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, SciLifeLab, Lund University
Lund, Sweden

Co-Author(s):

Laura Wisse  
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University
Lund, Sweden
Olof Strandberg  
Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund Univ
Lund, Sweden
Nicola Spotorno  
Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund Univ
Lund, Sweden
Hamid Behjat  
Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund Univ
Lund, Sweden
Danielle van Westen  
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Lund, Sweden
Sebastian Pamqvist  
Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund Univ
Lund, Sweden
Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren  
Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund Univ
Lund, Sweden
Shorena Janelidze  
Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of MediLund University
Lund, Sweden
Erik Stomrud  
Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund Univ
Lund, Sweden
Theodore Satterthwaite  
Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Philadelphia, PA, United States
Philadelphia, PA
Hansson Oskar  
Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund Univ
Lund, Sweden
Jacob Vogel, PhD  
Lund UniversityDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, SciLifeLab, Lund Universi
Lund, Sweden

Introduction:

Cognitive aging is a phenomenon that eventually affects most elderly individuals. This process is accelerated in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's disease (AD), which involve clinical impairment and decline in functional activities of daily living. Aging is accompanied by changes in brain functional network organization, with one of the hallmarks being decrease in system segregation (1). Similarly, nonlinear alterations to functional networks have been described in AD, posited as early neuronal responses to (and perhaps drivers of) AD pathophysiology (2). Functional changes in aging and AD have, however, mostly been studied in isolation, and the degree to which these phenomena interrelate is not well understood. Further, little is known about how variable such changes are in the population. In this exploratory study, we investigate how the brain's functional networks are reorganized at the individual level in aging and AD independently.

Methods:

The present work uses resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) data from the BioFINDER-2 study, encompassing 917 individuals (after quality filtering) with a baseline diagnosis of cognitively unimpaired (Normal, n=390), cognitively unimpaired with amyloid-β (Aβ) positivity (Normal+, n=95), mild cognitive impairment irrespective of Aβ (MCI, n=253) or Alzheimer's disease (AD, n=179). The rsfMRI images were acquired with a 3T scanner and preprocessed using a modified CPAC pipeline (3), including slice-timing correction, motion correction, bandpass filtering, frame censoring, and regression of physiological components, motion parameters and WM/CSF. Subjects were excluded based on mean (>0.3mm) and max (>3mm) frame-displacement. Images from the resulting dataset were smoothed (6 mm FWHM) and mean signal parcellated into 1000 regions as defined by the Schaefer atlas (4) to derive individual functional connectomes. To understand heterogeneity in functional connectivity over both age and AD, inter-subject similarity was estimated by averaging the pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients of each parcel's connectivity map between all subjects within each disease group (5). Personalized network atlases were constructed using an iterative approach of parcel reassignment (6), with the Yeo 2011 (7) atlas as prior. For each parcel, the probability of belonging to each network was estimated using logistic regression, with diagnosis, age and sex as independent variables. Network size was defined as the proportion of parcels belonging to that network for each subject and modeled using generalized additive models with penalized thin plate splines, diagnosis and sex as grouping variables and smoothed over age.

Results:

Across the majority of parcels, we observed a decrease in inter-subject similarity as both age and disease status progress, suggesting diverging patterns of age- and AD-related network fragmentation (Fig. 1A). Fig. 1B,C and Fig. 2A,D summarize migration of parcels between networks in AD and aging, while Fig. 2B,C describes changes in network size. In MCI and AD, parcels in sensory networks tended to be recruited by adjacent attention networks. Progression along the AD continuum involved consistent increase in the size of association networks; decrease in limbic network size occurred only during the MCI-AD transition. In contrast, aging was associated with substantial reorganization of the dorsal attention and limbic networks, with the former increasing in size with age and the latter decreasing sharply.
Supporting Image: fig1.png
Supporting Image: fig2.png
 

Conclusions:

These preliminary findings show a complex landscape of network reorganization associated with AD and aging. The differential reorganization observed in aging and AD may highlight the brain's distinct compensatory responses to neuropathology – but such interpretation should be balanced with the possibility that the alterations might themselves be dysfunctional or pathological. Further understanding of these dynamics could open avenues for targeted (e.g., stimulation-based) interventions and therapies.

Disorders of the Nervous System:

Neurodegenerative/ Late Life (eg. Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s) 1

Lifespan Development:

Aging 2

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural)
Segmentation and Parcellation
Task-Independent and Resting-State Analysis

Keywords:

Aging
Degenerative Disease
FUNCTIONAL MRI
Other - Individual parcellation

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Provide references using author date format

1. Bagarinao E, Watanabe H, Maesawa S, Mori D, Hara K, Kawabata K, et al. Reorganization of brain networks and its association with general cognitive performance over the adult lifespan. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 6;9(1):11352.
2. Franzmeier N, Dewenter A, Frontzkowski L, Dichgans M, Rubinski A, Neitzel J, et al. Patient-centered connectivity-based prediction of tau pathology spread in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Adv. 2020 Nov 27;6(48):eabd1327.
3. Craddock C, Sikka S, Cheung B, Khanuja R, Ghosh SS, Yan C, et al. Towards automated analysis of connectomes: The configurable pipeline for the analysis of connectomes (c-pac). Front Neuroinformatics. 2013;42(10.3389).
4. Schaefer A, Kong R, Gordon EM, Laumann TO, Zuo XN, Holmes AJ, et al. Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex from Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI. Cereb Cortex N Y NY. 2018 Sep;28(9):3095–114.
5. Mueller S, Wang D, Fox MD, Yeo BTT, Sepulcre J, Sabuncu MR, et al. Individual Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain. Neuron. 2013 Feb;77(3):586–95.
6. Wang D, Buckner RL, Fox MD, Holt DJ, Holmes AJ, Stoecklein S, et al. Parcellating cortical functional networks in individuals. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Dec;18(12):1853–60.
7. Thomas Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, Sabuncu MR, Lashkari D, Hollinshead M, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;106(3):1125–65.