Higher-order interaction of brain microstructural and functional connectome

Presented During:

Tuesday, June 25, 2024: 12:00 PM - 1:15 PM
COEX  
Room: Grand Ballroom 104-105  

Poster No:

1584 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Hao Wang1, Hui-jun Wu2, Yang-Yu Liu3, Linyuan Lü4

Institutions:

1School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan, 2School of Media & Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China., Shanghai, Shanghai, 3Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui

First Author:

Hao Wang  
School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Hainan University
Haikou, Hainan

Co-Author(s):

Hui-jun Wu  
School of Media & Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China.
Shanghai, Shanghai
Yang-Yu Liu  
Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA
Linyuan Lü  
University of Science and Technology of China
Hefei, Anhui

Introduction:

Despite a relatively fixed anatomical structure, the human brain can support rich cognitive functions, triggering particular interest in investigating structure-function relationships (Honey, Sporns et al. 2009). Myelin is a vital brain microstructure marker; however, most myelin studies have constructed a structural covariance network at the population level, making individual cognitive or behavioral predictions impossible. Therefore, examining the myelin microstructural and functional relationship at the individual level is urgently needed but is still elusive. Recently, higher-order representations (beyond the node or edge level) emerged, including simplicial complexes (Giusti, Pastalkova et al. 2015), persistent homology (Liang and Wang 2017), neural network (Suárez, Richards et al. 2021), subgraphs (Przulj 2007), and motifs (Benson, Gleich et al. 2016), which have proven to be extremely useful in understanding and comparing complex networks. Nevertheless, few studies have examined individual myelin microstructure-function relationships using higher-order representations. Here, we quantify the individual-level microstructure-function relationship using a higher-order framework and explore the microstructure-function higher-order relationship across individual cognitive scores, development and network scale.

Methods:

MRI data. Dataset: We downloaded unprocessed MR data of 213 participants from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) "S1200" new subjects release (Van Essen, Smith et al. 2013). We excluded eight participants who met any of the following criteria: (a) mean of framewise displacement (mFD) > 0.25 mm; (b) more than 20% of the FDs were above 0.2 mm; and (c) if any FDs were greater than 5 mm (Parkes, Fulcher et al. 2018). Seven participants aged > 36 years were excluded from the study. Finally, we obtained quality-controlled resting-state fMRI (rfMRI), T1-weighted, and T2-weighted images of 198 participants (108 males and 90 females). Here, we constructed the individual level myelin (T1w/T2w) structural network using probability distribution function (PDF)-based morphological methods (Wang, Jin et al. 2016) with Gordon parcellation of 333 brain regions (Gordon, Laumann et al. 2016), and constructed functional networks with the same parcellation as the myelin-structural network. Exploring the brain microstructure-function relationships using a higher-order framework, derived from 2- to 4-node subgraphs (Figure. 1)

Results:

Global (network-level) higher-order microstructure-function relationships were negatively correlated with male participants' personality scores and declined with age (P = 0.005). Nodal (node-level) higher-order microstructure-function relationships are not aligned uniformly throughout the brain, being stronger in association cortices and lower in sensory cortices (Figure 2a-b), showing gender differences (P < 0.001, FDR correction), see Figure 2c. Notably, higher-order microstructure-function relationships are maintained from the whole-brain to local circuits, which uncovers a compelling and straightforward principle of brain structure-function complex interactions (Figure. 2d-f). Additionally, targeted artificial attacks can disrupt these higher-order relationships. The main results are robust against several factors, including (I) effect of sparsity thresholding; (II) effect of sample size; (III) split-half reliability for nodal higher-order interactions; (IV) higher-order relationships on other types of networks.

Conclusions:

Our results advance our understanding of higher-order structural-function similarity that underlies cognition, individual differences, and aging, as well as provide a framework for measuring the similarity between complex systems.

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural) 1
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 2

Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:

Cortical Anatomy and Brain Mapping

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

Anatomical MRI
BOLD fMRI

Keywords:

Cognition
Computational Neuroscience
Computing
Data analysis
Modeling
MRI
Myelin
Statistical Methods

1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Supporting Image: Figure1.png
Supporting Image: Figure2.png
 

Provide references using author date format

Benson, A. R., D. F. Gleich and J. Leskovec (2016). "Higher-order organization of complex networks." Science 353(6295): 163-166.
Giusti, C., E. Pastalkova, C. Curto and V. Itskov (2015). "Clique topology reveals intrinsic geometric structure in neural correlations." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(44): 13455-13460.
Gordon, E. M., T. O. Laumann, B. Adeyemo, J. F. Huckins, W. M. Kelley and S. E. Petersen (2016). "Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations." Cereb Cortex 26(1): 288-303.
Honey, C. J., O. Sporns, L. Cammoun, X. Gigandet, J. P. Thiran, R. Meuli and P. Hagmann (2009). "Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(6): 2035-2040.
Liang, H. and H. Wang (2017). "Structure-Function Network Mapping and Its Assessment via Persistent Homology." PLoS Comput Biol 13(1): e1005325.
Parkes, L., B. Fulcher, M. Yucel and A. Fornito (2018). "An evaluation of the efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of motion correction strategies for resting-state functional MRI." Neuroimage 171: 415-436.
Przulj, N. (2007). "Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution." Bioinformatics 23(2): e177-183.
Suárez, L. E., B. A. Richards, G. Lajoie and B. Misic (2021). "Learning function from structure in neuromorphic networks." Nature Machine Intelligence 3(9): 771-786.
Van Essen, D. C., S. M. Smith, D. M. Barch, T. E. Behrens, E. Yacoub, K. Ugurbil and W. U.-M. H. Consortium (2013). "The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview." Neuroimage 80: 62-79.
Wang, H., X. Jin, Y. Zhang and J. Wang (2016). "Single-subject morphological brain networks: connectivity mapping, topological characterization and test-retest reliability." Brain Behav 6(4): e00448.