Poster No:
1366
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Xiaoyue Wang1, Lianglong Sun2, Xinyuan Liang2, Tengda Zhao2, Mingrui Xia2, Xuhong Liao3, Yong He2
Institutions:
1Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, 2Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 3School of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Xuhong Liao
School of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China
Yong He
Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China
Introduction:
Structural connectome (SC) and functional connectome (FC) interact and depend on each other to maintain brain function and support cognitive processing. While previous studies have reported SC-FC coupling, most of these studies analyzed them as isolated networks, ignoring their interdependent nature [1, 2]. Understanding how SC and FC connectome are topographically coordinated and contribute to cognition, as well as their neurobiological basis, remains crucial for comprehending brain organization principles.
Methods:
Using multimodal MRI data from S1200 dataset released by the Human Connectome Project (HCP) [3], we constructed individual-level SC (from diffusion MRI) and FC (from resting-state fMRI) connectomes based on the Glasser360 parcellation [4] for each of 1012 healthy young adult participants (aged 28.73 ± 3.71 years, 543 females). We modeled SC-FC interplay in a multiplex framework, establishing interlayer connections between identical nodes [5]. The multilayer modularity detection [6] was applied to characterize the interdependent connectome and computed multilayer modular variability [7] to quantify module assignment differences across layers. The multilayer modular variability was further assessed for its test-retest reliability, reproducibility, heritability, cognitive associations, and relationships with neurotransmitter systems and gene expression.
Results:
The multilayer modular variability exhibited substantial spatial heterogeneity across the cortex, with greater variability predominantly in the lateral prefrontal and parietal regions, dorsal medial prefrontal cortex and lateral temporal regions and less variability in the sensorimotor, visual, and ventral medial prefrontal cortex. This variability aligned with cortical hierarchical organization from primary to transmodal areas (Pearson's r = 0.56, Pspin < 0.0001), and cortical evolutionary expansion (Pearson's r = 0.51, Pspin < 0.001). The topology showed high test-retest reliability, reproducibility, and heritability. Higher modular variability in transmodal regions correlated with cognitive flexibility and better abstract cognitive performance. Additionally, we found that the spatial pattern of multilayer modular variability could be predicted by the density distributions of neurotransmitter receptors and transporters (Pearson's r = 0.59, Pspin < 0.0001), and exhibited significant correlation with the gene expression profiles (Pearson's r = 0.46, Pspin = 0.02). The associated genes were primarily involved in biological processes related to chemical synaptic transmission, and cellular components associated with synaptic parts, transport vesicles, and secretory vesicles.


Conclusions:
This study elucidates for the first time the nontrivial topographic, cognitive, and neurobiological profiles of the interdependent SC-FC connectome. The findings have implications for understanding brain organization and potential clinical applications in studying brain disorders.
Genetics:
Transcriptomics
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural)
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 1
Multivariate Approaches 2
Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Transmitter Receptors
Keywords:
Cognition
Computational Neuroscience
Modeling
MRI
Neurotransmitter
NORMAL HUMAN
RECEPTORS
Other - connectomics; gene expression; interdependent network; neurotransmitter; multilayer
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Resting state
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Healthy subjects
Was this research conducted in the United States?
No
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Functional MRI
Structural MRI
Diffusion MRI
Behavior
Computational modeling
For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?
3.0T
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
SPM
FSL
Free Surfer
Provide references using APA citation style.
1. Bengtsson, S. L. (2005). Extensive piano practicing has regionally specific effects on white matter development. Nature Neuroscience, 8(9), 1148-1150.
2 Grefkes, C. (2014). Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function. The Lancet Neurology, 13(2), 206-216.
3. Van Essen, D. C. (2013). The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage, 80, 62-79.
4. Glasser, M. F. (2016). A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature, 536(7615), 171-178.
5. Kivelä, M. (2014). Multilayer networks. Journal of complex networks, 2(3), 203-271.
6. Mucha, P. J. (2010). Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science, 328(5980), 876-878.
7. Liao, X. (2017). Individual differences and time-varying features of modular brain architecture. Neuroimage, 152, 94-107.
No