Poster No:
391
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Li Xue1, Ting Wang2, Junneng Shao1, Qian Liao1, Lingling Hua3, Hao Sun3, Zhijian Yao3, Qing Lu2
Institutions:
1School of Biological Sciences & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, NanJing, Jiangsu, 2School of Biological Sciences & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 3Department of Psychiatry, the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu
First Author:
Li Xue
School of Biological Sciences & Medical Engineering, Southeast University
NanJing, Jiangsu
Co-Author(s):
Ting Wang
School of Biological Sciences & Medical Engineering, Southeast University
Nanjing, Jiangsu
Junneng Shao
School of Biological Sciences & Medical Engineering, Southeast University
NanJing, Jiangsu
Qian Liao
School of Biological Sciences & Medical Engineering, Southeast University
NanJing, Jiangsu
Lingling Hua
Department of Psychiatry, the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu
Hao Sun
Department of Psychiatry, the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu
Zhijian Yao
Department of Psychiatry, the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu
Qing Lu
School of Biological Sciences & Medical Engineering, Southeast University
Nanjing, Jiangsu
Introduction:
The amygdala and its cortical circuits play important roles in both pathophysiology and therapeutic alleviation of major depressive disorder (MDD)1. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), two common antidepressants, modulate the connectivity and neurotransmission within cortico-amygdala circuit2. However, further investigations are required to understand the individual differences at amygdala level among patients who response to these two different antidepressants, which could lead to more personalized treatments for MDD. The aim of this study was to investigate the cortico-amygdala white matter (WM) connections and their association with antidepressant treatment and to clarify whether specific nuclei-level amygdala connection is sensitive in distinguishing SSRI and SNRI.
Methods:
The flowchart of whole work was shown in Figure 1. From diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of 106 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who response to SSRI (SSRI-Responders) or SNRI (SNRI-Responders), the cortico-amygdala WM connectivity was estimated using probabilistic tractography. 'Winner takes all' algorithm3 was used to label the amygdala voxels and then create a connectome labelling matrix according to its cortical WM connections. K-modes clustering method based on Hamming distance was used to cluster the amygdala into subdivisions. For the segmented subdivisions, we measured the fractional anisotropy (FA) values of each cortico-subdivision WM connection and compared between SSRI-Responders and SNRI-Responders. Finally, we decoded the neural circuit with discriminative significance using microscale transcriptomic and chemo-architecture analysis.
Results:
Significant difference was detected in the WM connections between left amygdala and frontal lobe. The left amygdala was subdivided into three nuclei according its cortical connections, named as superficial amygdala nucleus (supAMY), medial amygdala nucleus (medialAMY) and lateral amygdala nucleus (lateralAMY), as shown in Figure 2. Group difference was also detected in FA of fronto-medialAMY WM tracts, which we referred to a pharmacological propensity pattern. Furthermore, this pattern was colocalized with gene expression involved in "synaptic transmission" and aligned with the distribution of serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NAT) neurotransmitter system with different degree across two groups, as 5-HT is the strongest contributor (43.85%) to SSRI-Responders and NAT is the strongest contributor (42.74%) to SNRI-Responders.
Conclusions:
We reveal a pharmacological propensity pattern, fronto-medialAMY circuit, in distinguishing patients treated with SSRIs and SNRIs. The mapping between macroscale pharmacological propensity connectome and microscale molecular chemoarchitecture may provide new testable evidence to inform decision-making in antidepressant treatment of MDD.
Disorders of the Nervous System:
Psychiatric (eg. Depression, Anxiety, Schizophrenia) 1
Genetics:
Genetic Association Studies 2
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural)
Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Transmitter Receptors
Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:
Diffusion MRI
Keywords:
Computational Neuroscience
Machine Learning
Neurotransmitter
Phenotype-Genotype
Psychiatric Disorders
Sub-Cortical
Tractography
White Matter
1|2Indicates the priority used for review

·Figure 1

·Figure 2
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Resting state
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Patients
Was this research conducted in the United States?
No
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
No
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Diffusion MRI
For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?
3.0T
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
FSL
Free Surfer
Provide references using APA citation style.
[1] Nelson, J.C., L. Portera, and A.C. Leon, Are there differences in the symptoms that respond to a selective serotonin or norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor? Biol Psychiatry, 2005. 57(12): p. 1535-42.
[2]
No