A deep-to-superficial axis of prefrontal cortex myelin maturation balances plasticity and stability

Poster No:

1011 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Valerie Sydnor1, Daniel Petrie1, Shane McKeon1, Alyssa Famalette1, Will Foran1, Finnegan Calabro1, Bea Luna1

Institutions:

1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

First Author:

Valerie Sydnor, PhD  
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA

Co-Author(s):

Daniel Petrie  
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA
Shane McKeon  
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA
Alyssa Famalette  
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA
Will Foran  
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA
Finnegan Calabro  
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA
Bea Luna  
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA

Introduction:

The human prefrontal cortex (PFC) is an evolutionarily-expanded core of association cortex that exhibits protracted developmental plasticity (Larsen, 2018; Sydnor, 2023). Understanding when regulators of plasticity mature in the PFC can reveal when higher-order cognitive circuits are malleable, as well as when they transition to a state of stability. Animal studies have established that the growth of intracortical myelin is key restrictor of neuronal plasticity (McGee, 2005, Xin, 2024). Complementary human studies show that myelin matures last in the PFC (Baum, 2022). However, how trajectories of myelin growth vary across PFC layers−which differ in their connectivity targets, biological properties, and functional roles−is not known. Here, we harness ultra-high field quantitative imaging of intracortical myelin collected from youth longitudinally to characterize timescales of plasticity across deep and superficial layers of frontal cortex and link PFC myelination to neurocognitive specialization.

Methods:

We leveraged 7T R1 data collected from an accelerated longitudinal sample (10-32 years; 140 individuals with 215 scans; 70 female) to map myelin in the frontal cortical mantle. R1 is a histologically-validated and quantitative myelin imaging metric (Lazari, 2021; Lutti, 2014). R1 maps were derived from B1+ corrected T1 maps, projected to individual-specific cortical surfaces, and applied to index myelin at 7 cortical depths in frontal regions (excluding depths near pia and white matter). Generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) were used to model relationships between depth-specific R1 and age; the first derivative of age splines was calculated to index myelination rates and maturation ages. GAMMs were also used to quantify relationships between R1 and both EEG-derived cortical activity and task-based indices of learning and processing speed.

Results:

R1 significantly increased (pFDR < 0.05) in > 85% of frontal regions at all 7 cortical depths. A gradient of R1 maturational rate and timing was evident across depths: R1 increased at a slower rate and matured at older ages moving from deeper to superficial depths (Fig. 1A-B). Within each intracortical depth, regional variation in the rate of R1 increase correlated with hierarchical axes of cortical organization and cytoarchitectural variation; correlations were significant and strongest in superficial depths (Fig. 1C-H). Clustering of frontal regions based on depth-wise myelination trajectories uncovered a motor cluster (Neurosynth decoding: "movement") with early plateauing R1 trajectories at all depths, a lateral PFC cluster ("cognitive control") with adolescent plateauing trajectories in deep cortex but linear trajectories in superficial cortex, and a medial PFC cluster ("emotion regulation") with near-linear trajectories at all depths (Fig. 2). Relating R1 to EEG activity revealed that higher R1 was associated with a flatter aperiodic slope−a functional index of higher E/I balance and faster timescales of activity (Halgren, 2021, McKeon 2024). This association was significantly stronger for R1 in deep than superficial cortex for all EEG electrodes in lateral PFC (depth interaction ps < 0.05). Finally, higher R1 in both deep and superficial depths of the dorsolateral PFC was significantly (pFDR < 0.05) related to enhanced learning rates and faster cognitive (but not sensorimotor) processing speed.
Supporting Image: Figure1_OHBM2025-01.jpg
   ·Figure 1. Deep-to-superficial and hierarchical axes of frontal cortex R1 maturation
Supporting Image: Figure2_OHBM2025-01.jpg
   ·Figure 2. Depth-wise R1 maturational profiles diverge between functionally distinct cortical areas
 

Conclusions:

Myelin maturation is heterochronous in deep and superficial PFC and has dissociable functional consequences. Deep PFC layers, which comprise cortical-subcortical and feed-back "output" projections, show earlier myelin maturation and consolidation of circuitry. Superficial PFC layers, the main source of cortico-cortical "computational" connections, exhibit temporally-extended myelination that may endow them with protracted malleability. Asynchronous laminar maturation of myelin may allow the PFC to co-express stability and plasticity at different stages in layer-stratified processing hierarchies.

Higher Cognitive Functions:

Executive Function, Cognitive Control and Decision Making

Lifespan Development:

Normal Brain Development: Fetus to Adolescence 1

Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:

Cortical Cyto- and Myeloarchitecture 2

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

Anatomical MRI
EEG

Keywords:

Cognition
Cortical Layers
Development
Electroencephaolography (EEG)
HIGH FIELD MR
Myelin
Plasticity
Other - quantitative MRI; association cortex; excitation/inhibition balance

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Other

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Healthy subjects

Was this research conducted in the United States?

Yes

Are you Internal Review Board (IRB) certified? Please note: Failure to have IRB, if applicable will lead to automatic rejection of abstract.

Yes, I have IRB or AUCC approval

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

EEG/ERP
Structural MRI
Behavior
Computational modeling
Other, Please specify  -   Quantitative MRI

For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?

7T

Which processing packages did you use for your study?

AFNI
SPM
Free Surfer
Other, Please list  -   EEGLab, FOOOF

Provide references using APA citation style.

Baum, G. L., et al. (2022). Graded Variation in T1w/T2w Ratio during Adolescence: Measurement, Caveats, and Implications for Development of Cortical Myelin. Journal of Neuroscience, 42(29), 5681–5694.
Halgren, M., et al. (2021). The timescale and magnitude of 1/f aperiodic activity decrease with cortical depth in humans, macaques, and mice. bioRxiv. doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.28.454235
Larsen, B., & Luna, B. (2018). Adolescence as a neurobiological critical period for the development of higher-order cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 94, 179-195.
Lazari, A., & Lipp, I. (2021). Can MRI measure myelin? Systematic review, qualitative assessment, and meta-analysis of studies validating microstructural imaging with myelin histology. Neuroimage, 230, 117744.
Lutti, A., et al. (2014). Using high-resolution quantitative mapping of R1 as an index of cortical myelination. NeuroImage, 93, 176–188.
McGee, A. W., et al. (2005). Experience-Driven Plasticity of Visual Cortex Limited by Myelin and Nogo Receptor. Science, 309(5744), 2222–2226.
McKeon, S. D., et al. (2024). Aperiodic EEG and 7T MRSI evidence for maturation of E/I balance supporting the development of working memory through adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 66, 101373.
Sydnor, V. J., et al. (2023). Intrinsic activity development unfolds along a sensorimotor–association cortical axis in youth. Nature Neuroscience, 26(4), Article 4.
Xin, W., et al. (2024). Oligodendrocytes and myelin limit neuronal plasticity in visual cortex. Nature, 633(8031), 856–863.

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No