Poster No:
702
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Wenkun Lei1,2, Lin Du1,2, Xiaohan Tian1,2, Jing Lou1,2, Xinyi Dong1,2, Yuqing Sun1,2, Ruoxin Yang1,2, Xinghui Zhao1,2, Meng Wang1,2, Bing Liu1,2
Institutions:
1State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing, China, 2Beijing normal university, Beijing, China
First Author:
Wenkun Lei
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning|Beijing normal university
Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Co-Author(s):
Lin Du
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning|Beijing normal university
Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Xiaohan Tian
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning|Beijing normal university
Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Jing Lou
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning|Beijing normal university
Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Xinyi Dong
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning|Beijing normal university
Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Yuqing Sun
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning|Beijing normal university
Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Ruoxin Yang
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning|Beijing normal university
Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Xinghui Zhao
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning|Beijing normal university
Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Meng Wang
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning|Beijing normal university
Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Bing Liu
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning|Beijing normal university
Beijing, China|Beijing, China
Introduction:
Cellular transcriptomic entropy quantifies the variability or complexity in gene expression within a specific cell type (Teschendorff & Enver, 2017), High entropy values indicate greater diversity and unpredictability in gene expression, while low values reflect more consistent expression patterns (Jorstad et al., 2023). In this study, we use data from the Allen Human Brain Atlas (AHBA) and transcriptomic profiles of various cell types to create a whole-cortex map of cell-type-specific transcriptomic entropy.
Methods:
We used the Abagen (Markello et al., 2021) tool to extract transcriptomic data from the AHBA for cortical regions of the brain. Probes that exceeded background noise in at least 30% of tissue samples were included, and for each gene, the probe with the highest differential stability was selected. This process retained 16,383 genes for analysis. Expression values for each donor were normalized across genes, and the resulting values were further normalized across samples. The data were then mapped onto the Schaefer 400 ROI atlas, focusing on the left hemisphere due to the characteristics of the AHBA dataset. We employed a set of conserved differentially expressed genes (DEGs) found to be reliable across all eight cortical areas from the single-cell dataset (Jorstad et al., 2023). Subsequently, transcriptomic entropy was calculated for each cell type in each ROI, followed by a whole-cortex mapping of these entropy values. We also examined the spatial correlation between the entropy distribution and the deconvoluted distribution for each cell type (Zhang et al., 2024).
Results:
We found that primary brain regions have relatively low entropy values, while higher-order brain regions tend to exhibit higher entropy values. Additionally, brain regions closer to the subcortex also display lower entropy values. We also observed a significant spatial correlation between entropy values and the distribution of cell types such as L2/3 IT, L4 IT, L5/6 NP, L6b, Sncg, and Astro.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that the distribution of entropy values is consistent with the level of brain differentiation. Furthermore, entropy distributions exhibit specificity across different cell types. A strong correlation between the distribution of excitatory neurons and their entropy values likely reflects the functional roles of these neurons across cortical regions.
Genetics:
Transcriptomics 1
Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Cortical Anatomy and Brain Mapping 2
Keywords:
Cellular
Neuron
Other - Transcriptomics
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Other
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Healthy subjects
Was this research conducted in the United States?
No
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Postmortem anatomy
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
Free Surfer
Provide references using APA citation style.
Jorstad, N. L., Close, J., Johansen, N., Yanny, A. M., Barkan, E. R., Travaglini, K. J., Bertagnolli, D., Campos, J., Casper, T., Crichton, K., Dee, N., Ding, S.-L., Gelfand, E., Goldy, J., Hirschstein, D., Kiick, K., Kroll, M., Kunst, M., Lathia, K., … Lein, E. S. (2023). Transcriptomic cytoarchitecture reveals principles of human neocortex organization. Science, 382(6667), eadf6812. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf6812
Markello, R. D., Arnatkeviciute, A., Poline, J.-B., Fulcher, B. D., Fornito, A., & Misic, B. (2021). Standardizing workflows in imaging transcriptomics with the abagen toolbox. eLife, 10, e72129. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72129
Teschendorff, A. E., & Enver, T. (2017). Single-cell entropy for accurate estimation of differentiation potency from a cell’s transcriptome. Nature Communications, 8(1), 15599. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15599
Zhang, X.-H., Anderson, K. M., Dong, H.-M., Chopra, S., Dhamala, E., Emani, P. S., Gerstein, M. B., Margulies, D. S., & Holmes, A. J. (2024). The cell-type underpinnings of the human functional cortical connectome. Nature Neuroscience, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01812-2
No