New Insights into Glioma Intratumoral Networks

Poster No:

1384 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Hongbo Bao1,2, Yinyan Wang1, Haris Sair3

Institutions:

1Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, 2Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China, 3Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

First Author:

Hongbo Bao  
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University|Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
Beijing, China|Harbin, China

Co-Author(s):

Yinyan Wang  
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, China
Haris Sair  
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD

Introduction:

Gliomas are not isolated pathologies but dynamic entities that interact with neuronal circuits (Jung et al., 2019; Krishna et al., 2023), disrupting normal brain networks while forming new functional connections (Mandal, Brem, & Suckling, 2023; Venkataramani, Tanev, Kuner, Wick, & Winkler, 2021). These interactions significantly influence clinical manifestations, including cognitive deficits and motor impairments. However, the extent to which glioma-induced functional network changes correlate with tumor pathology and patient outcomes remains underexplored. This study examines the relationships between intratumoral functional regions, pathological characteristics, brain network features, and clinical outcomes, providing insights into the neural mechanisms underlying glioma progression and prognosis.

Methods:

Resting-state fMRI data from 306 glioma patients across two centers were analyzed using an individualized parcellation method to delineate intratumoral functional networks. Tumors were segmented into core and peritumoral regions, with functional connectivity analyzed relative to Yeo 17 brain networks. Associations between the ratio of the intratumoral functional regions to tumor volume (RIFR), glioma pathology (WHO grade, IDH mutation, EGFR status), brain network features, and clinical outcomes (KPS, epilepsy, cognitive and language function, survival) were assessed. Prognostic models based on functional connectivity were developed using machine learning techniques.

Results:

Intratumoral functional regions were present in all glioma subtypes, with significant variability in their proportions (Figures 1A-D). Higher RIFR was associated with gliomas of lower grades and favorable molecular profiles, such as IDH mutation and EGFR negativity (Figures 2A-C). Patients with worse clinical symptoms, including lower KPS scores and epilepsy, exhibited larger absolute volumes of intratumoral functional regions (Figures 2D-E). RIFR correlated positively with ReHo, characteristic path length, clustering coefficient, and local efficiency, but negatively with global efficiency, indicating its relationship with whole-brain network disruptions (Figures 2F-J). Lower RIFR was linked to more severe cognitive and language impairments, suggesting its role in functional deficits (Figures 2K-L). Survival analysis revealed that patients with lower RIFR had significantly better outcomes (Figure 2M). Prognostic models incorporating RIFR and other network metrics demonstrated high predictive accuracy for two-year survival (AUC = 0.82 for Random Forest, AUC = 0.81 for SVM; Figure 2N), emphasizing the clinical relevance of glioma-related functional network features.
Supporting Image: Figure1.jpg
   ·Figure 1. Individual parcellation of functional networks in glioma.
Supporting Image: Figure2.jpg
   ·Figure 2. Integrative analysis of glioma intratumoral regions with pathological characteristics, brain network features, and clinical outcomes.
 

Conclusions:

This study highlights the importance of individualized functional mapping in glioma patients, showing that intratumoral functional regions are closely tied to tumor pathology, whole brain networks, and clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that integrating brain network alterations can enhance prognostic accuracy and guide personalized treatment strategies for glioma patients.

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 1

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

BOLD fMRI 2

Keywords:

FUNCTIONAL MRI
Other - Glioma; Brain networks; Clinical outcomes

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Resting state

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Patients

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Functional MRI

For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?

3.0T

Which processing packages did you use for your study?

AFNI
SPM

Provide references using APA citation style.

Jung, E., Alfonso, J., Osswald, M., Monyer, H., Wick, W., & Winkler, F. (2019). Emerging intersections between neuroscience and glioma biology. Nat Neurosci, 22(12), 1951-1960. doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0540-y
Krishna, S., Choudhury, A., Keough, M. B., Seo, K., Ni, L., Kakaizada, S., . . . Hervey-Jumper, S. L. (2023). Glioblastoma remodelling of human neural circuits decreases survival. Nature. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06036-1
Mandal, A. S., Brem, S., & Suckling, J. (2023). Brain network mapping and glioma pathophysiology. Brain Commun, 5(2), fcad040. doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcad040
Venkataramani, V., Tanev, D. I., Kuner, T., Wick, W., & Winkler, F. (2021). Synaptic input to brain tumors: clinical implications. Neuro Oncol, 23(1), 23-33. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa158

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No