We, Them, or Us? An fMRI study on Superordinate Identity and Self-referential neuroactivity.

Poster No:

633 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Kelly Sng1, Nisha Syed Nasser1, Hsin-Yu Lin1, Gianluca Esposito2, SH Annabel Chen1

Institutions:

1Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore, 2University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy

First Author:

Kelly Sng  
Nanyang Technological University
Singapore, Singapore

Co-Author(s):

Nisha Syed Nasser  
Nanyang Technological University
Singapore, Singapore
Hsin-Yu Lin  
Nanyang Technological University
Singapore, Singapore
Gianluca Esposito  
University of Trento
Rovereto, Italy
SH Annabel Chen, PhD  
Nanyang Technological University
Singapore, Singapore

Introduction:

Social identity theory posits that individuals categorise themselves and others into in-group (IG) and out-group (OG) (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). In-group faces often evoke more self-referential processing compared to out-group faces (Scheepers et al., 2013; Tropp & Wright, 2001). Superordinate identities – inclusive categories that transcend traditional social groups (Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000) – when salient, can blur intergroup distinctions, encouraging integration of out-group members into a broader sense of self (Wenzel et al., 2007), which can influence neural processing of social stimuli. The Singapore environment with a multi-cultural and ethnic society that emphasises racial harmony enabled investigations into this superordinate identity at the neural level. The present study examines the effects of superordinate (nationality; SG) and subordinate (ethnicity; EN) primes on neural responses to IG and OG faces. We hypothesise that H1) SG primes will elicit more self-referential activity than EN primes (SG>EN), H2) particularly in response to OG faces (OG_SG>OG_EN). Furthermore, H3) SG priming will reduce the neural differentiation between IG and OG faces (OG_SG>IG_EN).

Methods:

Participants underwent fMRI (Siemens 3T) while viewing ethnic IG and OG faces paired with either SG or respective EN primes in visual or auditory modality. The tasks were presented in 2 visual (VP) and 2 auditory (AP) runs, counterbalanced (see Figure 1). VP analysis included 88 Singaporean participants (Mage=24.5, SDage=4.43; Chinese n=30, Malay n=28, Indian n=30), and AP analysis included 92 Singaporean participants (Mage=24.5, SDage= 4.52; Chinese n=30, Malay n=29, Indian n=33). Imaging parameters: EP2D-BOLD (52 axial slices, 3mm-thickness; TR=1500ms; TE=30ms; flip angle=90°; FOV=225mm; voxel size=3x3x3mm, interleaved) and T1-weighted 3D MP-RAGE (176 axial slices, 1mm-thickness; TR=2000ms; TE=2.26ms; flip angle=8°; FOV=256mm). Preprocessing with SPM12: slice-timing correction, realignment, coregistration, normalisation to T1 MNI152, and smoothing with 9mm FWHM Gaussian kernel. Whole-brain analyses using GLM were thresholded at FWE-corrected p<.05, k>10, on the contrasts: SG>EN (H1), OG_SG>OG_EN (H2), OG_SG>IG_EN (H3).
Supporting Image: Figure1.png
 

Results:

VP showed increased bilateral precuneus and parahippocampal gyrus activity in SG>EN (H1; Figure 2a), OG_SG>OG_EN (H2), and OG_SG>IG_EN (H3). AP found left temporal gyrus activity in SG>EN (H1; Figure 2b), OG_SG>OG_EN (H2), but no significant clusters in OG_SG>IG_EN (H3). No significant clusters were found in all contrasts in their opposite direction (e.g., EN>SG).
Supporting Image: Figure2.png
 

Conclusions:

We observed increased activity in the precuneus and parahippocampal gyrus (for VP) and left superior temporal gyrus (for AP) – key regions within the default network (Gusnard & Raichle, 2001) associated with self-referential processes. This finding aligns with H1, which posited that SG would elicit stronger self-referential processing compared to EN identities. A possible explanation is that a superordinate identity encourages a more inclusive sense of self, thereby engaging brain regions involved in self-related cognition more robustly.

In addition, the results revealed that SG priming may facilitate self-referential processing even for faces typically categorised as out-group (H2), eluding to the potential of a superordinate identity to reduce psychological distance between the self and out-group. Interestingly, while AP supported H3 by showing no difference in activity between superordinate in-group and ethnic in-group conditions, VP demonstrated increased self-referential activity when viewing out-group faces with superordinate primes. This suggests a need for further investigation into relative sensitivity of visual and auditory primes in modulating self-referential processing.

By emphasising the salience of a superordinate identity, our findings offer a potential framework for addressing intergroup conflicts in multicultural societies.

Emotion, Motivation and Social Neuroscience:

Self Processes
Social Cognition 1
Social Neuroscience Other 2

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Activation (eg. BOLD task-fMRI)
Univariate Modeling

Keywords:

FUNCTIONAL MRI
Social Interactions
Other - In-Group & Out-Group; Ethnicity & Race; Nationality; Superordinate Identity; Self-referential processing

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Task-activation

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Healthy subjects

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Functional MRI

For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?

3.0T

Which processing packages did you use for your study?

SPM

Provide references using APA citation style.

Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.
Gusnard, D. A. (2001). Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2(10), 685–694. https://doi.org/10.1038/35094500
Scheepers, D. (2013). The neural correlates of in-group and self-face perception: is there overlap for high identifiers?. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00528
Tajfel, H. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-37). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Tropp, L. R. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201275007
Wenzel, M. (2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701728302

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No