Layer-specific cell counts in BigBrain – decomposing cortex-wide numbers based on cytoarchitectonics
Poster No:
1799
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Sebastian Bludau1, Timo Dickscheid1,2,3, Anna Steffens1, Christian Schiffer1,3, Eric Upschulte4, Katrin Amunts1,4
Institutions:
1Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH / INM-1, Jülich, NRW, Germany, 2Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences - Institute of Computer Science, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, 3Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1) and Helmholtz AI, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany, 4Cecile and Oskar Vogt Institute for Brain Research, Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Introduction:
Cell counts of the cerebral cortex represent one of the most fundamental characteristics of brain organization, and serve as the basis for studying evolution, development and disease (e.g., [1, 2]). However, the total number of cells in the brain or cerebral cortex does not reflect the variation between layers and cortical areas, which is related to the functional heterogeneity of the human brain. Therefore, we investigated layer-specific cell counts in 94 cytoarchitectonic cortical areas in the anatomical BigBrain model [3].
Methods:
The study is based on cell counts and cortical thickness measurements in high-resolution 2D scans (1 µm in-plane resolution), most of which are already publicly available [4]. In total, 940 patches were analyzed across 94 areas of the Julich Brain Atlas [5] (Fig. 1), with 10 patches sampled per area, ensuring a >65% probability of region being present at each location. Using siibra-python [6], patches were assigned to Julich Brain cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps by transforming their locations to MNI space [7]. These were chosen to be perpendicular to the cortical surface. Manual layer annotations were performed by anatomical experts and independently verified. Cells were segmented using a novel deep learning approach [8, 9] including correction for truncated cells (Fig1). Relative cell counts were corrected for histological shrinkage [10]. To cross-validate data and capture intersubject variability among brains, patches from frontal pole area Fp1 of ten Julich-Atlas brains were analyzed using the same counting approach and compared to the BigBrain data.
Results:
Comprehensive data sets of 940 image patches were obtained including the 1 µm images with manual annotation of cortical layers, the cell counts, cell sizes, and cortical as well as layer thicknesses (Fig1, Fig 2). The analysis revealed a considerable regional variations in cell counts across layers and areas as illustrated in Fig. 2. E.g., areas of the insula showed up to 15% variance. After shrinkage correction and adjusting for truncated cells, the corrected total cell count of the human cortex has been estimated to be approximately 33.9 billion. Based on a neuron-to-glia ratio of 1:1.5 [1], this corresponds to 13.6 billion neurons and 20.3 billion glial cells. The average cortical thickness across all regions was 2667.15 µm. Quantitative measures of areas Fp1 of the BigBrain (Fig. 2) were in the range of variation of the ten brains from Julich Brain Atlas. The data will be shared as part of a growing dataset collection [11] in accordance with the FAIR principles via the EBRAINS infrastructure.
Conclusions:
This study has introduced a new, comprehensive dataset with detailed area- and layer specific cell counts of the human cerebral cortex, supplementing previous data at whole-cortex level [1]. It extended our knowledge on cytoarchitectonic differences, e.g., between granular, dysgranular and granular areas and further quantified regional differences at laminar level. The considerable differences between areas within the insular cortex, as one example, confirms the hypothesis that macroanatomically defined regions do not adequately reflect the microstructural organization of the brain; they may lump together structurally and functionally different areas. Data on cortical thickness correspond to earlier histological and MR-based findings [2, 12, 13]. We will continuously supplement the data together with new releases of Julich Brain Atlas areas. Cell counts based on cytoarchitectonics may serve as reference for comparative and disease studies, and inform modeling and simulation, and AI, highlighting the value of high-resolution atlases for capturing details of microscopical brain organization.
Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Cortical Anatomy and Brain Mapping
Cortical Cyto- and Myeloarchitecture 2
Neuroinformatics and Data Sharing:
Brain Atlases 1
Databasing and Data Sharing
Keywords:
Atlasing
Cellular
Computational Neuroscience
Computing
Cortex
Cortical Layers
Data analysis
Design and Analysis
Modeling
Open Data
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Abstract Information
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Was this research conducted in the United States?
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
Provide references using APA citation style.
2. von Economo, C.F., et al., Die Cytoarchitektonik der Hirnrinde des erwachsenen Menschen. 1925: J. Springer.
3. Amunts, K., et al., BigBrain: an ultrahigh-resolution 3D human brain model. Science, 2013. 340(6139): p. 1472-5.
4. Schiffer, C., Lepage, C., Omidyeganeh, M., Mohlberg, H., Brandstetter, A., Bludau, S., Heuer, K., Toussaint, P.-J., Wenzel, S., Dickscheid, T., Evans, A. C., & Amunts, K. , Selected 1 micron scans of BigBrain histological sections (v1.0) 2022. [Data set]. EBRAINS. https://doi.org/10.25493/JWTF-PAB
5. Amunts, K., et al., Julich-Brain: A 3D probabilistic atlas of the human brain's cytoarchitecture. Science, 2020. 369(6506): p. 988-992.
6. Dickscheid, T., Gui, X., Simsek, A. N., Koehnen, L., Marcenko, V., Schiffer, C., Bludau, S., & Amunts, K., siibra-python. Zenodo link: https://zenodo.org/records/14184565.
7. Lebenberg, J., et al., A framework based on sulcal constraints to align preterm, infant and adult human brain images acquired in vivo and post mortem. Brain Struct Funct, 2018. 223(9): p. 4153-4168.
8. Ma, J., et al., The multimodality cell segmentation challenge: toward universal solutions. Nat Methods, 2024. 21(6): p. 1103-1113.
9. Upschulte, E., et al., Contour proposal networks for biomedical instance segmentation. Med Image Anal, 2022. 77: p. 102371.
10. Amunts, K., et al., Gender-specific left-right asymmetries in human visual cortex. J Neurosci, 2007. 27(6): p. 1356-64.
11. Dickscheid, T., Bludau, S., Paquola, C., Schiffer, C., Upschulte, E., & Amunts, K., Layer-specific distributions of segmented cells in different cytoarchitectonic regions of BigBrain iso cortex. EBRAINS project link: https://search.kg.ebrains.eu/instances/f06a2fd1-a9ca-42a3-b754-adaa025adb10.
12. Frangou, S., et al., Cortical thickness across the lifespan: Data from 17,075 healthy individuals aged 3-90 years. Hum Brain Mapp, 2022. 43(1): p. 431-451.
13. Wagstyl, K., et al., BigBrain 3D atlas of cortical layers: Cortical and laminar thickness gradients diverge in sensory and motor cortices. PLoS Biol, 2020. 18(4): p. e3000678.