Presented During:
Wednesday, June 25, 2025: 5:45 PM - 7:00 PM
Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre
Room:
M2 (Mezzanine Level)
Poster No:
703
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Shangzheng Huang1, Ang Li1, Tongyu Zhang1, Yingjie Peng1, Changsheng Dong1
Institutions:
1State Key Lab of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
First Author:
Shangzheng Huang
State Key Lab of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Beijing, China
Co-Author(s):
Ang Li
State Key Lab of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Beijing, China
Tongyu Zhang
State Key Lab of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Beijing, China
Yingjie Peng
State Key Lab of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Beijing, China
Changsheng Dong
State Key Lab of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Beijing, China
Introduction:
The human cortical architecture exhibits complex functional divisions and organizational patterns, which are often altered in various psychiatric disorders, with these changes being closely regulated at the molecular level. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying cortical organizational patterns relies on transcriptomic data at the whole-cortex scale. Historically, the Allen Human Brain Atlas (AHBA) has been used to correlate different macroscopic networks, deviant patterns, and gene expression, providing insights into the molecular mechanisms. However, due to the limitations of microarray sequencing, while the AHBA data provides transcriptomic information at whole-cortex spatial resolution, it is constrained by sample size and lacks information on specific cell types. Recently, the release of human single-nucleus datasets has partly addressed these shortcomings, though due to sampling constraints, these datasets do not provide full cortical coverage across brain regions. Therefore, combining the strengths of both datasets can deepen our understanding of the complex molecular mechanisms underlying the brain cortex. A key question is whether data from different modalities can represent similar cortical transcriptional patterns. In this study, we analyzed the consistencies and differences between two modalities of data in representing cortical transcriptional patterns.
Methods:
For the single-nucleus data, we selected two subjects, H19.30.001 and H19.30.002, with minimal batch effects and a high overlap in the sampled brain regions. Preprocessing was performed separately for each subject. After preprocessing, the single-nucleus data were aggregated at the brain region level to obtain the average gene expression matrix for each subject. Next, using a digitized atlas that overlaps with the single-nucleus sampled brain regions, we extracted the regional average expression matrix from AHBA using the abagen toolkit. Since our focus was on the reproducibility of cortical expression patterns, subcortical regions were excluded. The similarity between the regional average expressions of the two modalities and and the cross-modal spatial expression consistency for each gene were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). We then selected the intersection of the top 20% cross-modal genes from both H19.30.001 and H19.30.002, totaling 2,172 genes, for Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis.
Results:
We found significant consistency between the two datasets at the regional transcriptional level (Fig.1). Analysis of the spatial expression patterns of individual gene revealed that genes with consistent cross-modal spatial patterns exhibited stable expression across individuals (Fig.2 top). These genes were enriched in modules related to cellular connectivity, ion transmembrane transport, neuronal projection, and neuron communication, and were associated with various behavioral abnormalities and diseases (Fig.2 bottom).

·Figure 1

·Figure 2
Conclusions:
Our study reveals both the consistency and divergence of different modalities of data in cortical representation. At the brain region scale, the AHBA and single-nucleus datasets show overall consistent expression patterns. At the gene level, genes related to core brain functions are better able to resist the differential effects introduced by sequencing methods. Our findings suggest that when integrating transcriptomic data from different modalities to elucidate brain mechanisms, it is crucial to consider the consistency of gene expression across modalities to avoid discrepancies in interpretation.
Genetics:
Genetic Modeling and Analysis Methods 2
Transcriptomics 1
Keywords:
Other - Transcriptomics
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Other
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Healthy subjects
Was this research conducted in the United States?
No
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Functional MRI
Computational modeling
Provide references using APA citation style.
1. Dear, R., Wagstyl, K., Seidlitz, 1., Markello, R. D., Arnatkevičiûtë, A., Anderson, K. M., Bethlehem, R. A. I., Raznahan, A., Bullmore, E. T., & Vértes, P. E. (2024). Cortical gene expression architecture links healthy neurodevelopment to the imaging, transcriptomics and genetics of autism and schizophrenia. Nature Neuroscience, 27(6), 1075—1086. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01624-4
2. Hawrylycz, M. 1., Lein, E. S., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Shen, E. H., Ng, L., Miller, 1. A., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Smith, K. A., Ebbert, A., Riley, Z. L., Abajian, C., Beckmann, C. F., Bernard, A., Bertagnolli, D., Boe, A. F., Cartagena, P. M., Chakravarty, M. M., Chapin, M., Chong, 1., ... Jones,
A. R. (2012). An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature, 489(7416), 391—399. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11405
3. Hawrylycz, M., Miller, 1. A., Menon, V., Feng, D., Dolbeare, T., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Jegga,
A. G., Aronow, B. 1., Lee, C.-K., Bernard, A., Glasser, M. F., Dierker, D. L., Menche, 1., Szafer, A., Collman, F., Grange, P., Berman, K. A., Mihalas, S., Yao, Z., ... Lein, E. (2015). Canonical genetic signatures of the adult human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 18(12), 1832—1844. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4171
4. Markello, R. D., Arnatkeviciute, A., Poline, J.-B., Fulcher, B. D., Fornito, A., & Misic, B. (2021). Standardizing workflows in imaging transcriptomics with the abagen toolbox. ELife, 10, e72129. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72129
5. Siletti, K., Hodge, R., Mossi Albiach, A., Lee, K. W., Ding, S.-L., Hu, L., Lönnerberg, P., Bakken,
T., Casper, T., Clark, M., Dee, N., Gloe, 1., Hirschstein, D., Shapovalova, N. V., Keene, C. D., Nyhus, 1., Tung, H., Yanny, A. M., Arenas, E., ... Linnarsson, S. (2023). Transcriptomic diversity of cell types across the adult human brain. Science, 382(6667), eadd7046. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add7046
No