Neural activity in human eyeblink conditioning: an optically pumped magnetometer-based MEG study

Poster No:

1941 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Sophie Lin1, Tim Tierney2, Stephanie Mellor3, George O’Neill2, Sven Bestmann2, Gareth Barnes2, R Miall4

Institutions:

1University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 2University College London, London, United Kingdom, 3University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 4University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

First Author:

Sophie Lin  
University of Melbourne
Melbourne, VIC

Co-Author(s):

Tim Tierney  
University College London
London, United Kingdom
Stephanie Mellor, Dr  
University of Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland
George O’Neill, Dr  
University College London
London, United Kingdom
Sven Bestmann, Prof  
University College London
London, United Kingdom
Gareth Barnes, Prof  
University College London
London, United Kingdom
R Miall, Prof  
University of Birmingham
Birmingham, United Kingdom

Introduction:

The cerebellum is essential for the acquisition of classical eyeblink conditioning. Learning is assumed to be achieved through complex spikes of Purkinje cells which 'teach' the association between unconditioned and conditioned stimuli (Ohmae & Medina 2015). Yet human electrophysiological evidence about this activity is largely lacking. Previously we showed that we could use optically pumped magnetometer-based MEG (OP-MEG) to detect human cerebellar activity during unconditioned eyeblinks (Lin et al., 2019). Here we investigated cerebellar OP-MEG during eyeblink conditioning.

Methods:

We used a 500 ms binaural tone as the conditioned stimulus (CS) followed by a brief air-puff delivered to outer canthus of a participant's eye as the unconditioned stimulus (US). A session consisted of a 200-trial baseline block (140 US-only trials, 50 CS-only trials, 10 paired CS-US trials) followed by four 200 trial acquisition blocks (190 CS-US trials and 10 CS-only trials), total 800 trials. 12-14 OPM sensors were used across the cerebellum in 4 participants.

Results:

We observed unconditioned stimulus-related evoked responses locating in the cerebellum (Figure. A-C). These evoked responses diminished during the acquisition of conditioned responses, which corresponds with previous observed changes of Purkinje cell activities in animals. We also observed evoked responses immediately before conditioned blinks in 3 out of 4 participants, which were also located in the cerebellum (Figure. D-F).
Supporting Image: OHBMFigure_new1.png
 

Conclusions:

In this pilot study we used OP-MEG to identify neural responses that are associated with classic eyeblink conditioning. We found attenuated US-related response after conditioning, with similarities to the complex spike firing rate changes observed in animal studies (Nicholson & Freeman, 2003). We did not find strong evidence of other neural substrates, such as correlates of simple spike suppression or nuclear activity. We speculate that there was insufficient conditioning during the recording session.

Learning and Memory:

Learning and Memory Other 2

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

MEG 1

Keywords:

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Learning
MEG
Perception

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Task-activation

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Healthy subjects

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

MEG

Which processing packages did you use for your study?

SPM

Provide references using APA citation style.

Ohmae, S., & Medina, J. F. (2015). Climbing fibers encode a temporal-difference prediction error during cerebellar learning in mice. Nature Neuroscience, 18(12), 1798–1803.
Lin, C. H., Tierney, T. M., Holmes, N., Boto, E., Leggett, J., Bestmann, S., ... & Miall, R. C. (2019). Using optically pumped magnetometers to measure magnetoencephalographic signals in the human cerebellum. The Journal of physiology, 597(16), 4309-4324.
Nicholson, D. A., & Freeman, J. H. (2003). Addition of inhibition in the olivocerebellar system and the ontogeny of a motor memory. Nature Neuroscience, 6(5), 532–537

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No