Hierarchical disorganization in structure-function coupling of brain connectomes in autism

Poster No:

1201 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

TAEYEON KIM1, Bo-yong Park2

Institutions:

1INHA University, Incheon, Republic of Korea, 2Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

First Author:

TAEYEON KIM  
INHA University
Incheon, Republic of Korea

Co-Author:

Bo-yong Park  
Korea University
Seoul, Republic of Korea

Introduction:

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impairments in communication, behavior, and social interactions (APA, 2022). Studies have shown alterations in both structural and functional brain network in ASD, particularly along the hierarchical axis spanning sensory to cognitive control regions (Hong, 2019; Park, 2021). However, the simultaneously disruptions of structural connectivity (SC) and functional connectivity (FC) in ASD remains poorly understood. A recent study introduced a Riemannian optimization-based approach for integrating SC and FC (Benkarim, 2022; Park, 2024). Building on these findings, we hypothesized that ASD would show distinct disruptions in hierarchical structure-function coupling compared to typically developing (TD) controls.

Methods:

We obtained structural, diffusion, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange II (ABIDE-II) database. Of the 1,045 participants, those with incomplete multimodal MRI data were excluded, leaving 158 participants for the study (ASD: n=91, 11.9±5.2 years, 14.3% female; TD: n=67, 12.8±4.0 years, 4.5% female). Structure-function coupling was analyzed separately for ASD and TD groups using Riemannian optimization with five-fold cross-validation (Benkarim, 2022). SC was projected onto a low-dimensional manifold space via diffusion map embedding across varying diffusion times (t between 1 and 10), where lower t reflects single-synapse transfer and higher t captures multi-synapse communication (Benkarim, 2022). FC was simulated for each diffusion time, and accuracy was measured by calculating linear correlations between the empirical and simulated FC matrices. The first principal component (i.e., gradient) was generated from the simulated FC, and hierarchical distance was calculated by subtracting gradient values of the default mode network from those of the visual and somatomotor networks (Fig. 1A). Diffusion times corresponding to the highest (sFC_HD) and lowest (sFC_LD) hierarchical distance were identified, and gradient changes (∆Gradient=Gradient(sFC_HD )-Gradient(sFC_LD)) were computed. Gradient changes were then compared between the ASD and TD groups.

Results:

Prediction accuracy improved with increasing diffusion times and was higher in the TD group compared to the ASD group (Fig. 1B), suggesting weaker structure-function coupling in ASD. At low diffusion times, individuals with ASD showed a clearer hierarchical structure, but at higher diffusion times, this structure became less pronounced compared to the TD group (Fig. 1A). Between-group comparisons of gradient changes revealed that TD group exhibited greater changes in the default mode and frontoparietal regions, while ASD group showed larger changes in the visual and somatomotor regions (FDR < 0.001; Fig. 1C).
Supporting Image: OHBM_Figure.jpg
 

Conclusions:

This study revealed differences in the hierarchical structure of structure-function coupling between ASD and TD groups. Our findings align with previous studies showing atypical sensitivity in sensory and transmodal regions in individuals with ASD (Hong, 2019).
Funding: This work was supported by the Institute for Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation (IITP) funded by the Korea Government (MSIT) (No. 2022-0-00448/RS-2022-II220448, Deep Total Recall: Continual Learning for Human-Like Recall of Artificial Neural Networks; RS-2021-II212068, Artificial Intelligence Innovation Hub), and Institute for Basic Science (IBS-R015-D1).

Disorders of the Nervous System:

Neurodevelopmental/ Early Life (eg. ADHD, autism) 2

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural) 1

Motor Behavior:

Motor Behavior Other

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

Anatomical MRI
Diffusion MRI

Keywords:

Autism
Computational Neuroscience
Data analysis
Development
Psychiatric
Other - structrue-function coupling

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Resting state

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Patients

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Functional MRI
Structural MRI
Diffusion MRI
Computational modeling

For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?

1T

Which processing packages did you use for your study?

Other, Please list  -   micapipe v0.2.0

Provide references using APA citation style.

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Neurodevelopmental disorders. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.).
Hong, S.J. (2019). Atypical functional connectome hierarchy in autism. Nature Communications, 10, 1022.
Park, B.Y. (2021). Differences in subcortico-cortical interactions identified from connectome and microcircuit models in autism. Nature Communications, 12, 2225.
Benkarim, O. (2022). A Riemannian approach to predicting brain function from the structural connectome. NeuroImage, 257, 119299.
Park, B.Y. (2024). Connectome-wide structure-function coupling models implicate polysynaptic alterations in autism. NeuroImage, 285, 120481.

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No