The Relations Among Anxiety, Movie-Watching, and In-Scanner Motion

Poster No:

1523 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Peter Kirk1, Andre Zugman1, Daniel Pine1, Katharina Kircanski1

Institutions:

1NIH, Bethesda, MD

First Author:

Peter Kirk  
NIH
Bethesda, MD

Co-Author(s):

Andre Zugman  
NIH
Bethesda, MD
Daniel Pine  
NIH
Bethesda, MD
Katharina Kircanski  
NIH
Bethesda, MD

Introduction:

Children and adolescents are a difficult-to-image population due their tendency to move during scanning sessions. Prior work demonstrates that neutral and positive movie stimuli reduce in-scanner movement for this population. Movies have also started to emerge as a disorder-relevant stimulus for probing threat- and anxiety-related neural dynamics. Yet, no study has examined how anxiety symptoms and movie-induced states of anxiety impact in-scanner motion among youth. One could imagine such anxiogenic media induce excessive movement, given the physiological responding it can elicit.

Methods:

We assessed: 1) the extent to which an anxiety-inducing movie clip altered in-scanner data quality (movement, censoring, and DVARS) in a pediatric sample with and without anxiety disorders (n=78); and 2) investigated interactions between anxiety symptoms and movie-attenuated motion in a highly powered, transdiagnostic pediatric sample (n=2058).

Results:

Our results suggest anxiogenic movie-watching in fact reduces in-scanner movement compared to resting-state (ps < .05), increasing the quantity/quality of data. In one measure, pathological anxiety appeared to impact movie-attenuated motion, but the effect was small.

Conclusions:

The present study demonstrated that anxiogenic movie-watching was associated with decreased in-scanner motion and increased signal quality compared to resting-state scanning. There was not sufficient evidence to suggest anxiety symptoms moderate this effect. Even if it does, the effect size of anxiety appears of a far lower magnitude compared to that of age and condition. In sum, our results encourage the use of movie-watching for studying induced- and pathological anxiety on methodological grounds, suggesting movie-watching may confer potential boosts to statistical power for developmental neuroimaging studies of anxiety via increases to data quality and quantity.

Disorders of the Nervous System:

Psychiatric (eg. Depression, Anxiety, Schizophrenia) 2

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Methods Development 1
Motion Correction and Preprocessing
Other Methods

Keywords:

Acquisition
Anxiety
Emotions
Experimental Design
FUNCTIONAL MRI

1|2Indicates the priority used for review
Supporting Image: Figure2.png
 

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Other

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Patients

Was this research conducted in the United States?

Yes

Are you Internal Review Board (IRB) certified? Please note: Failure to have IRB, if applicable will lead to automatic rejection of abstract.

Yes, I have IRB or AUCC approval

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Functional MRI

For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?

3.0T

Which processing packages did you use for your study?

AFNI
Other, Please list  -   MRIQC

Provide references using APA citation style.

Esteban O, Birman D, Schaer M, Koyejo OO, Poldrack RA, Gorgolewski KJ; MRIQC: Advancing the Automatic Prediction of Image Quality in MRI from Unseen Sites; PLOS ONE 12(9):e0184661; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184661.

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No