Connectome-based Growth Models Reveal Neurophysiological Subtypes of Subthreshold Depression

Presented During:

Friday, June 27, 2025: 11:30 AM - 12:45 PM
Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre  
Room: Great Hall  

Poster No:

460 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Xiaoyi Sun1, Guanmao Chen2, Pan Chen2, Xuan Bu1, Zhangzhang Qi2, Shu Zhang2, Chao Chen2, Zixuan Guo2, Xinyue Tang2, Ruoyi Chen2, Xiaoqin Wang3, Dongtao Wei3, Yuan Chen4, Bangshan Liu5, Chu-Chung Huang6, Yanting Zheng7, Yankun Wu8, Taolin Chen9, Yuqi Cheng10, Xiufeng Xu10, Qiyong Gong9, Tianmei Si8, Shijun Qiu7, Ching-Po Lin11, Jingliang Cheng4, Yanqing Tang12, Fei Wang12, Jiang Qiu3, Peng Xie13, Lingjiang Li5, Yong He1, DIDA-MDD Working Group1, Qian Tao2, Mingrui Xia1, Ying Wang2

Institutions:

1Beijing Normal University, Beijing, Beijing, 2Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 3Southwest University, Chongqing, Chongqing, 4The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 5The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 6East China Normal Univerisity, Shanghai, Shanghai, 7The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 8Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, Beijing, 9West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 10First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, 11National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, 12The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 13The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, Chongqing

First Author:

Xiaoyi Sun  
Beijing Normal University
Beijing, Beijing

Co-Author(s):

Guanmao Chen  
Jinan University
Guangzhou, Guangzhou
Pan Chen  
Jinan University
Guangzhou, Guangzhou
Xuan Bu  
Beijing Normal University
Beijing, Beijing
Zhangzhang Qi  
Jinan University
Guangzhou, Guangzhou
Shu Zhang  
Jinan University
Guangzhou, Guangzhou
Chao Chen  
Jinan University
Guangzhou, Guangzhou
Zixuan Guo  
Jinan University
Guangzhou, Guangzhou
Xinyue Tang  
Jinan University
Guangzhou, Guangzhou
Ruoyi Chen  
Jinan University
Guangzhou, Guangzhou
Xiaoqin Wang  
Southwest University
Chongqing, Chongqing
Dongtao Wei  
Southwest University
Chongqing, Chongqing
Yuan Chen  
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan
Bangshan Liu  
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan
Chu-Chung Huang  
East China Normal Univerisity
Shanghai, Shanghai
Yanting Zheng  
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
Guangzhou, Guangdong
Yankun Wu  
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing
Taolin Chen  
West China Hospital of Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan
Yuqi Cheng  
First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
Kunming, Yunnan
Xiufeng Xu  
First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
Kunming, Yunnan
Qiyong Gong  
West China Hospital of Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan
Tianmei Si  
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing
Shijun Qiu  
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
Guangzhou, Guangdong
Ching-Po Lin  
National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University
Taipei, Taiwan
Jingliang Cheng  
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan
Yanqing Tang  
The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning
Fei Wang  
The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning
Jiang Qiu  
Southwest University
Chongqing, Chongqing
Peng Xie  
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing
Lingjiang Li  
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan
Yong He  
Beijing Normal University
Beijing, Beijing
DIDA-MDD Working Group  
Beijing Normal University
Beijing, Beijing
Qian Tao  
Jinan University
Guangzhou, Guangzhou
Mingrui Xia  
Beijing Normal University
Beijing, Beijing
Ying Wang  
Jinan University
Guangzhou, Guangzhou

Introduction:

Subthreshold depression (StD) poses a high risk for major depressive disorder (MDD) and is characterized by significant clinical heterogeneity among individuals (Cuijpers and Smit, 2004; Eaton, et al., 1995). However, the neurobiological substrates of this heterogeneity remain largely unknown, posing substantial challenges for early detection and effective intervention. Previous studies using resting-state functional MRI (r-fMRI) have documented disruptions in the functional connectome in StD participants (Gao, et al., 2016; Hwang, et al., 2016; Yin, et al., 2024; Yokoyama, et al., 2018; Zhang, et al., 2021), advancing our understanding of its neurobiological basis. However, these studies primarily focused on group-averaged alterations, largely overlooking individual differences among StD participants. Here, we aimed to characterize the age-related trajectory of the functional connectome in a large healthy dataset using normative models, identifying clinically significant neurobiological subtypes based on each participant's deviations from this model. This exploration would deepen our understanding of the distinct neurobiological mechanism underlying clinical heterogeneity in StD and inspire imaging-derived candidate phenotypes for the guidance of precise diagnosis and treatment.

Methods:

This study included r-fMRI data from 197 StD participants (aged 18-35) at Jinan University and 1,203 healthy participants (aged 13-81) across ten research centers. After a standard preprocessing pipeline, we constructed a whole-brain functional network for each subject and calculated the functional connectivity strength (FCS) for each region. For each region, we estimated a normative model of FCS as a function against age and sex using Gaussian process regression (Marquand, et al., 2016) in healthy participants. Individual deviations of StD participants were then estimated based on these models and the extreme deviations were obtained with a threshold of ±2.6. To assess intersubject heterogeneity, we computed the percentage of participants showing extreme deviations in each region. Finally, we used k-means clustering to explore StD subtypes with distinct deviation patterns and compared subtype differences in clinical variables, cognitive function, gene expression profiles, and treatment responses to bright light therapy (BLT).

Results:

In total, 69.04% of StD participants showed extreme deviations in at least one brain region (28.93% and 58.38% for positive and negative deviations, respectively, Fig 1a). Extreme positive deviations were mostly located in the default mode regions, whereas negative deviations were mainly concentrated in the lateral temporal, medial occipital, and medial sensorimotor cortex (Fig 1b). However, extreme deviations in any given region were observed in less than 3.55% of participants, indicating high intersubject heterogeneity (Fig 1b). Two StD subtypes were identified: subtype 1 (n=68) showed more severe deviations than subtype 2 (n=129), and the deviation patterns were conversed (Fig 1c-e). Subtype 1 exhibited more severe depressive symptoms and poorer cognitive performance (p<0.05, Fig 1f). Using the AHBA dataset (Hawrylycz, et al., 2012), we found gene associations with FCS deviations only in subtype 1 (Fig 2a-b). Among 47 individuals with BLT follow-up data (subtype 1/2: n=15/32), clinical symptoms and brain deviations improved in both subtypes, whereas the direction of brain remission differed (Fig 2c-d). Support vector regression revealed that baseline deviation patterns significantly predicted treatment response only for subtype 1 (p=0.018) but not for subtype 2 (p>0.05, one-tailed permutation test) (Fig 2e).
Supporting Image: Figure1.png
   ·Fig 1
Supporting Image: Figure2.png
   ·Fig 2
 

Conclusions:

The present study highlights the inter-subject heterogeneity of functional connectome disruptions in StD and suggests two different neurophysiological subtypes, which provide valuable insights into the understanding of heterogeneous subclinical forms of MDD and pave the way toward personalized diagnosis and treatment.

Disorders of the Nervous System:

Psychiatric (eg. Depression, Anxiety, Schizophrenia) 1

Genetics:

Genetic Association Studies

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Bayesian Modeling
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 2

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

BOLD fMRI

Keywords:

FUNCTIONAL MRI
Psychiatric Disorders
Other - subthreshold depression, functional connectivity, connectome, individual difference, heterogeneous, neurophysiological subtypes

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Resting state

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Patients

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Functional MRI

For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?

3.0T

Which processing packages did you use for your study?

SPM

Provide references using APA citation style.

Cuijpers, P., et al. (2004). Subthreshold depression as a risk indicator for major depressive disorder: a systematic review of prospective studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109(5), 325-31.
Eaton, W.W., et al. (1995). Prodromes and precursors: epidemiologic data for primary prevention of disorders with slow onset. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152(7), 967-72.
Gao, C., et al. (2016). Decreased subcortical and increased cortical degree centrality in a nonclinical college student sample with subclinical depressive symptoms: a resting-state fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 617.
Hawrylycz, M.J., et al. (2012). An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature, 489(7416), 391-399.
Hwang, J.W., et al. (2016). Enhanced default mode network connectivity with ventral striatum in subthreshold depression individuals. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 76, 111-20.
Marquand, A.F., et al. (2016). Understanding Heterogeneity in Clinical Cohorts Using Normative Models: Beyond Case-Control Studies. Biological Psychiatry, 80(7), 552-61.
Yin, X., et al. (2024). Brain network hierarchy reorganization in subthreshold depression. NeuroImage: Clinical, 42, 103594.
Yokoyama, S., et al. (2018). Effects of behavioral activation on default mode network connectivity in subthreshold depression: A preliminary resting-state fMRI study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 156-163.
Zhang, B., et al. (2021). Altered spontaneous neural activity in the precuneus, middle and superior frontal gyri, and hippocampus in college students with subclinical depression. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), 280.

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No