Poster No:
1408
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Minji Ha1, Inkyung Park2, Hyungyou Park3, Taekwan Kim4, Wu Jeong Hwang2, Jiseon Jang1, Minah Kim1, Jun Soo Kwon5
Institutions:
1Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Seoul, 2Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Seoul, 3Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 4Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Daejeon, 5Hanyang University Hospital, Seoul, Seoul
First Author:
Minji Ha
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Seoul
Co-Author(s):
Inkyung Park
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences
Seoul, Seoul
Hyungyou Park
Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Taekwan Kim
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Daejeon, Daejeon
Wu Jeong Hwang
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences
Seoul, Seoul
Jiseon Jang
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Seoul
Minah Kim
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Seoul
Introduction:
Cerebellar dysconnectivity has been consistently linked to psychosis, along with concurrent disruptions in the thalamus and cortical regions. These disruptions are associated with the triple network model, which explains psychopathological phenomena as abnormal interactions within the salience network (SAL), default mode network (DMN), and executive central network (ECN). However, the pattern of cerebellar functional network interactions with the cortical and thalamic networks across the different stages of psychosis risk within the triple network model still remains largely unknown.
Methods:
Resting-state fMRI data from 241 participants, including 37 first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients, 63 clinical high risk (CHR) individuals, 41 unaffected relatives (URs) of schizophrenia patients who have high genetic loading, and 100 healthy controls (HCs), were used. Functional connectivity between cerebellar and cortical networks, and between thalamic and cerebellar networks, was calculated. Subsequently, these functional connectivity values were compared across the groups, and correlations between error processing performance and functional connectivity strength were computed within the FEP.
Results:
FEP patients exhibited increased cerebellar-cortical and decreased cerebellar-thalamic connectivity compared to HCs. CHR individuals showed predominantly increased connectivity with localized disruptions across cerebellar, thalamic, and cortical regions. URs demonstrated no significant group differences. In FEP, reduced cerebellar-thalamic SAL connectivity was negatively correlated with error processing performance.

·Between-network connectivity results and the correlational analysis results
Conclusions:
These findings suggest a progression from localized disruptions within cerebellar, thalamic, and cortical networks to large-scale cross-regional dysconnectivity across psychosis stages. The observed correlations point to a potential role for the cerebellum in predictive coding and salience mapping, mediated by interactions with thalamic and cortical networks. This study expands the triple network model to encompass large-scale cortico-thalamo-cerebellar connectivity, offering new insights into psychosis progression and network-level disruption.

·Expanded cortico-thalamo-cerebellar triple network model.
Disorders of the Nervous System:
Psychiatric (eg. Depression, Anxiety, Schizophrenia) 2
Higher Cognitive Functions:
Reasoning and Problem Solving
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural)
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 1
Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:
BOLD fMRI
Keywords:
Cerebellum
Cognition
FUNCTIONAL MRI
Meta-Cognition
Psychiatric
Schizophrenia
Thalamus
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Resting state
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Patients
Was this research conducted in the United States?
No
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Functional MRI
For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?
3.0T
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
SPM
FSL
Free Surfer
Provide references using APA citation style.
Moberget, T., & Ivry, R. B. (2019). Prediction, Psychosis, and the Cerebellum. Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 4(9), 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.06.001
Ito M. (2006). Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine. Progress in neurobiology, 78(3-5), 272–303.
Menon, V., Palaniyappan, L., & Supekar, K. (2023). Integrative Brain Network and Salience Models of Psychopathology and Cognitive Dysfunction in Schizophrenia. Biological psychiatry, 94(2), 108–120.
No