From Infancy to Old Age: Exploring Claustrum Volume Changes Throughout the Lifespan

Poster No:

1000 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Sevilay Ayyildiz1, Antonia Neubauer2, Melissa Thalhammer3, Hongwei Li4, Jil Wendt1, Aurore Menegaux5, Rebecca Hippen1, Benita Schmitz-Koep6, David Schinz1, Claus Zimmer3, Dennis Hedderich1, Christian Sorg7

Institutions:

1Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, 2Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Bavaria, 3Institute for Neuroradiology, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Bavaria, 4Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 55. TUM-Neuroimaging Center of Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, 6TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Bavaria, 7Department of Psychiatry, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria

First Author:

Sevilay Ayyildiz  
Technical University of Munich
Munich, Bavaria

Co-Author(s):

Antonia Neubauer  
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich
Munich, Bavaria
Melissa Thalhammer  
Institute for Neuroradiology, TUM University Hospital
Munich, Bavaria
Hongwei Li  
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, MA
Jil Wendt  
Technical University of Munich
Munich, Bavaria
Aurore Menegaux  
5. TUM-Neuroimaging Center of Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
Munich, Bavaria
Rebecca Hippen  
Technical University of Munich
Munich, Bavaria
Benita Schmitz-Koep  
TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health
Munich, Bavaria
David Schinz  
Technical University of Munich
Munich, Bavaria
Claus Zimmer  
Institute for Neuroradiology, TUM University Hospital
Munich, Bavaria
Dennis Hedderich  
Technical University of Munich
Munich, Bavaria
Christian Sorg  
Department of Psychiatry, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
Munich, Bavaria

Introduction:

The claustrum is a small grey matter structure located between the insula and striatum (Jackson, Smith, & Lee, 2020). It is the most extensively connected brain structure relative to its volume, forming networks with cortical and subcortical regions (Crick & Koch, 2005; Torgerson, Irimia, Goh, & Van Horn, 2015). Alterations in claustrum volume are observed across various clinical conditions and age groups, indicating a potential role of the claustrum in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders (Ayyildiz et al., 2023; Davis, 2008). Complementary to cross-sectional changes for certain clinical conditions, it remains unclear how the claustrum changes along development and aging in the healthy population. The current study, therefore, investigates the whole trajectory of the claustrum volume across the lifespan and investigates potential influences of hemisphere and sex.

Methods:

The study comprises data from six datasets, encompassing a cohort of 3474 healthy participants aged 1–80 years, with nearly equal representation of men (48%) and women (52%). The datasets include anonymized conventional 3D T1-weighted (T1w) MRI images sourced from the following: the UNC/UMN Lifespan Baby Connectome Project, the Calgary Preschool MRI Dataset, a selected subset from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (5.1 release), and the Lifespan Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset. Participants without mental disorders, cognitive impairments, or significant medical conditions and with T1w scans of adequate resolution for precise claustrum segmentation were included in the analysis. All T1w scans underwent a preprocessing in the FSL toolbox, a protocol that included brain extraction, denoising, and resampling to 1mm3 to standardize the spatial resolution across images. The claustrum segmentation process employed a developed in-house deep learning algorithm and used transfer learning from adult scans (Li et al., 2021; Neubauer et al., 2022). We used warped Bayesian Linear Regression (BLR) within the PCNtoolkit framework (cite 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118715 and https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-022-00696-5) to model normative trajectories of claustrum development across the lifespan, including age, sex, scanner type, and total intracranial volume as covariates. Developmental milestones and sex differences in the claustrum volume trajectory were assessed and delineated based on the resulting normative models.

Results:

Lifespan trajectories indicated that bilateral claustrum volume increased until adolescence, peaking at an average age of 18.5 years (CI 18.4–18.7) for the right (Figure 1 A1) and 16.7 years (CI 16.6–16.9) for the left claustrum (Figure 1 A2), followed by a near-linear decline. Growth velocity reached its highest at approximately 1.1 years (CI 1–1.4). Age-stratified analyses of bilateral lateralization revealed significant gender differences, with males exhibiting larger left claustrum volumes during late adolescence (ages 16–17, p < 0.05) and early adulthood (ages 26–29, p < 0.05). For the right claustrum, males consistently showed larger volumes compared to females from mid-adolescence through early adulthood (ages 15–37, p < 0.001) and persisted into later adulthood (ages 62–68, p < 0.05).
Supporting Image: Figure1_Volume.jpg
   ·Figure 1: The 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th percentiles quantify the range of variation among lifespan-healthy individuals
 

Conclusions:

The application of deep learning-based techniques for claustrum segmentation, coupled with normative modeling to generate reference plots for claustrum volume, represents a robust methodology for identifying the lifelong trajectory of the claustrum volumes. Investigating volumetric changes across various age intervals is essential for accurately delineating the distinctions between normal and pathological development of the claustrum.

Higher Cognitive Functions:

Higher Cognitive Functions Other

Lifespan Development:

Lifespan Development Other 1

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Bayesian Modeling
Segmentation and Parcellation 2

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

Anatomical MRI

Keywords:

Aging
Data analysis
Data Organization
Morphometrics
MRI
Open Data
STRUCTURAL MRI

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Other

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Healthy subjects

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Structural MRI

For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?

1.5T

Provide references using APA citation style.

1. Ayyildiz, S., Velioglu, H. A., Ayyildiz, B., Sutcubasi, B., Hanoglu, L., Bayraktaroglu, Z., et al. (2023). Differentiation of claustrum resting‐state functional connectivity in healthy aging, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease. Human Brain Mapping, 44(4), 1741.
2. Crick, F. C., & Koch, C. (2005). What is the function of the claustrum? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
3. Davis, W. (2008). The Claustrum in Autism and Typically Developing Male Children: A Quantitative MRI study.
4. Jackson, J., Smith, J. B., & Lee, A. K. (2020). The Anatomy and Physiology of Claustrum-Cortex Interactions. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 43, 231–247.
5. Li, H., Menegaux, A., Schmitz-Koep, B., Neubauer, A., Bäuerlein, F. J. B., Shit, S., et al. (2021). Automated claustrum segmentation in human brain MRI using deep learning. Human Brain Mapping, 42(18), 5862–5872.
6. Neubauer, A., Li, H. B., Wendt, J., Schmitz-Koep, B., Menegaux, A., Schinz, D., et al. (2022). Efficient Claustrum Segmentation in T2-weighted Neonatal Brain MRI Using Transfer Learning from Adult Scans. Clinical Neuroradiology, 1–12.
7. Torgerson, C. M., Irimia, A., Goh, S. Y. M., & Van Horn, J. D. (2015). The DTI connectivity of the human claustrum. Human Brain Mapping, 36(3), 827–838.

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No