Network Level Analysis Toolbox for connectome-wide association studies

Poster No:

1547 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Andrew Eck1, Ari Segel2, Donna Dierker3, Jim Pollaro3, Adam Eggebrecht4, Muriah Wheelock1

Institutions:

1Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 2Washington University in St Louis, Saint Louis, MO, 3Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, 4Washington University School of Medicine, Eureka, MO

First Author:

Andrew Eck  
Washington University in St. Louis
St. Louis, MO

Co-Author(s):

Ari Segel  
Washington University in St Louis
Saint Louis, MO
Donna Dierker  
Washington University in St Louis
St Louis, MO
Jim Pollaro  
Washington University in St Louis
St Louis, MO
Adam Eggebrecht  
Washington University School of Medicine
Eureka, MO
Muriah Wheelock  
Washington University in St. Louis
St. Louis, MO

Introduction:

Determining the mechanisms by which the brain generates cognition, perception, and emotion hinges upon quantifying the relationships between coordinated brain activity and behavior. These brain-behavior association analyses typically consist of several thousand statistical tests which poses a challenge for controlling the false discovery rate. While contemporary connectome research views the brain as an extensive, complex network of non-adjacent, yet functionally and structurally connected brain regions, standard voxel extent cluster correction approaches do not utilize the spatial topology of brain networks when estimating cluster size significance (Friston et al., 1994). Similarly, an edge level Bonferroni or FDR correction on connectomes with thousands of potential connections is unlikely to yield significant findings (Greene et al., 2016). Limited prior work has leveraged the hierarchical network structure of the brain to probe connectome associations with behavior using a variety of statistical approaches (Noble et al., 2022; Sripada et al., 2020). However, a unified, standardized, extensible, and flexible software suite is lacking. Network Level Analysis (NLA) software fills this gap by offering a standardized toolkit that incorporates the hierarchical network structure of the brain to quantify connectome-wide associations with behavior.

Methods:

NLA is an extensible MATLAB based software package for the analysis of behavioral associations with brain connectivity data including functional, structural, or task connectivity. NLA utilizes a model-based statistical approach known variously as 'pathway analysis', 'over-representation analysis', or 'enrichment analysis', which was first used to describe behavioral or clinical associations in genome-wide association studies (Subramanian et al. 2005). In this way, NLA diverges from most contemporary tools either focusing on single connection associations (Marek et al., 2022) or cluster correction (Friston et al., 1994; Zalesky et al., 2010). By organizing connectivity-behavior associations according to an a priori model of underlying neurobiology (i.e., systems or networks), NLA leverages the structure of the human connectome and provides a framework for rational interpretation and replication of findings across research methodologies. Finally, the integration of connectome analysis and visualization techniques within a single, extensible MATLAB-based pipeline makes NLA a powerful tool for statistical testing and production of publication quality images all in one package (Figure 1B).
Supporting Image: OHBM_Figure1.png
 

Results:

To date, NLA has been used in several connectome-wide association studies spanning brain development to degeneration (Eggebrecht et al., 2017; Wheelock et al., 2019; Wheelock et al., 2023). Recently, we have developed a graphical user interface to increase accessibility (Figure 1B). We have significantly expanded the number of edge and network level statistical options, included additional quality control diagnostic plots, and incorporated many standard areal and system parcellation atlases (e.g., Schaefer, Gordon, Power, etc.). We have also added various controls for multiple comparison corrections, both at the permutation ranking step (Anderson-Winkler, Westfall-Young), and post-hoc correction methods on the network-level results (Bonferonni, Benjamini-Hochberg, Benjamini-Yekutieli).

Conclusions:

The NLA toolbox is a versatile analysis pipeline which leverages the structural and functional architecture of the brain in combination with rigorous statistical testing and validation procedures that can define brain-behavior relationships across species, across the lifespan, and in health and disease. Importantly, NLA uses data-driven permutation testing that respects the underlying covariance structure of connectivity data and leverages the fundamental topological structure of the connectome, affording whole-brain analyses while negating the need for punitive statistical thresholds.

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 2
Methods Development 1

Keywords:

Computational Neuroscience
Data analysis
Multivariate
Open-Source Software
Systems
Univariate

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Other

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Healthy subjects

Was this research conducted in the United States?

Yes

Are you Internal Review Board (IRB) certified? Please note: Failure to have IRB, if applicable will lead to automatic rejection of abstract.

Yes, I have IRB or AUCC approval

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Functional MRI
Behavior
Computational modeling

Provide references using APA citation style.

Friston, K. J., Worsley, K. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Mazziotta, J. C. & Evans, A. C. Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent: Assessing Focal Activations by Spatial Extent. Hum Brain Mapp 1, 210– 220 (1994). 34 1.
Greene, D. J., Church, J. A., Dosenbach, N. U., Nielsen, A. N., Adeyemo, B., Nardos, B., . . . Schlaggar, B. L.
(2016). Multivariate pattern classification of pediatric Tourette syndrome using functional connectivity MRI. Dev Sci, 19(4), 581-598. doi:10.1111/desc.12407
Noble, S., Mejia, A. F., Zalesky, A., & Scheinost, D. (2022). Improving power in functional magnetic resonance imaging by moving beyond cluster-level inference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 119(32), e2203020119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2203020119
Sripada, C., Rutherford, S., Angstadt, M., Thompson, W. K., Luciana, M., Weigard, A., . . . Heitzeg, M. (2020). Prediction of neurocognition in youth from resting state fMRI. Mol Psychiatry, 25(12), 3413-3421. doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0481-6
Subramanian, A. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genomewide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
Marek, S., Tervo-Clemmens, B., Calabro, F. J., Montez, D. F., Kay, B. P., Hatoum, A. S., . . . Dosenbach, N. U. F. (2022). Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals. Nature, 603(7902), 654-660. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04492-9
Zalesky, A., Fornito, A. & Bullmore, E. T. Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks. NeuroImage 53, 1197–1207 (2010).
Eggebrecht, A. T., Elison, J. T., Feczko, E., Todorov, A., Wolff, J. J., Kandala, S., . . . Pruett, J. R., Jr. (2017). Joint Attention and Brain Functional Connectivity in Infants and Toddlers. Cerebral Cortex, 27(3), 1709-1720. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw403
Wheelock, M. D., Hect, J. L., Hernandez-Andrade, E., Hassan, S. S., Romero, R., Eggebrecht, A. T., & Thomason,
M. E. (2019). Sex differences in functional connectivity during fetal brain development. Dev Cogn Neurosci, 36, 100632. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100632
Wheelock, M. D., Strain, J. F., Mansfield, P., Tu, J. C., Tanenbaum, A., Preische, O., . . . Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer, N. (2023). Brain network decoupling with increased serum neurofilament and reduced cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease. Brain, 146(7), 2928-2943. doi:10.1093/brain/awac498

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No