Poster No:
2020
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Haley Wang1, Carolyn Amir1, Andrea Luppi2
Institutions:
1University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA, 2University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
First Author:
Haley Wang
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, USA
Co-Author(s):
Carolyn Amir
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, USA
Introduction:
Early psychosis is characterized by disrupted neural dynamics and cognitive processing, but the precise nature of these alterations remains unclear. While previous studies have found differences in neural dynamics in psychosis using measures such as temporal signal variability, neural entropy-which captures the complexity and predictability of neural activity patterns-remains understudied. Brain entropy offers unique insights into neural organization by quantifying the regularity and complexity of activity patterns. We investigated whether spatial entropy of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) differs between early psychosis patients and healthy controls using complementary entropy metrics. Based on theories of disrupted neural organization in early psychosis, we hypothesized that early psychosis patients would demonstrate higher spatial entropy compared to healthy controls, indicating more disorganized neural dynamics, particularly in regions involved in higher cognitive and affective functioning.
Methods:
We analyzed resting-state fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project Early Psychosis dataset (Release 1.1), including 122 early psychosis patients and 57 healthy controls. Brain parcellation was performed for both cortical and subcortical regions using the Schaefer 2018 atlas (200 parcels) and Tian 2020 atlas (16 parcels), respectively. We calculated spatial entropy at the regional level using two complementary approaches: Lempel-Ziv complexity (LZ76), which captures algorithmic complexity of spatial patterns, and Shannon's entropy, which measures information content of activity distributions. General linear models were used to compare entropy metrics between groups, controlling for age, age-squared, and sex, with false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons.
Results:
Analysis revealed a significant group difference in LZ76 complexity in the left temporoparietal region (17Networks_LH_TempPar_1; β=0.050, q=.048), with early psychosis patients showing higher spatial complexity. Interestingly, LZ76 and Shannon's entropy measures showed a moderate negative correlation across regions (r=-0.412, p<.001), suggesting they capture distinct aspects of spatial organization. No regions showed significant group differences in Shannon's entropy after FDR correction. These findings indicate subtle but specific alterations in the spatial organization of brain activity in early psychosis, particularly in regions associated with social cognition and sensory integration.
Conclusions:
Our results provide novel evidence for increased spatial complexity of brain activity in early psychosis, specifically in temporoparietal regions. This region represents a key node in the default mode network (DMN) critical for self-referential processing and social cognition. The dissociation between LZ76 and Shannon's entropy measures suggests different aspects of spatial disorganization that may reflect distinct neurobiological mechanisms in the context of early psychosis. These complementary entropy metrics may provide a novel window into understanding how altered neural dynamics and network organization contribute to psychosis pathophysiology. Future work will examine the relationship between these entropy alterations and clinical symptoms, as well as expand analyses to network-level spatial entropy and temporal dynamics to build a more comprehensive picture of neural complexity in early psychosis.
Disorders of the Nervous System:
Psychiatric (eg. Depression, Anxiety, Schizophrenia) 2
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural)
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling
Neuroinformatics and Data Sharing:
Informatics Other
Perception, Attention and Motor Behavior:
Consciousness and Awareness 1
Keywords:
Computational Neuroscience
Consciousness
FUNCTIONAL MRI
Pre-registration
Psychiatric Disorders
Schizophrenia
Statistical Methods
Other - Entropy
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Resting state
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Patients
Was this research conducted in the United States?
Yes
Are you Internal Review Board (IRB) certified?
Please note: Failure to have IRB, if applicable will lead to automatic rejection of abstract.
Not applicable
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Functional MRI
Computational modeling
For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?
3.0T
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
Free Surfer
Other, Please list
-
QuNex
Provide references using APA citation style.
1. Amir, C., Luppi, A. I., & Wang, H. (2024). Temporal and spatial entropy analysis in resting-state fMRI data: A comparison between Early Psychosis patients and controls. OSF Registries. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AHQN9
2. Carhart-Harris, R. L., Leech, R., Erritzoe, D., Williams, T. M., Stone, J. M., Evans, J., Sharp, D. J., Feilding, A., Wise, R. G., & Nutt, D. J. (2013). Functional connectivity measures after psilocybin inform a novel hypothesis of early psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(6), 1343–1351. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbs117
3. Tian, Y., Margulies, D. S., Breakspear, M., & Zalesky, A. (2020). Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients. Nature Neuroscience, 23(11), 1421–1432. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00711-6
4. Breakspear, M. (2017). Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4497
5. Lempel, A., & Ziv, J. (1976). On the complexity of finite sequences. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 22(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1976.1055501
6. Saenger, V. M., Ponce-Alvarez, A., Adhikari, M., Hagmann, P., Deco, G., & Corbetta, M. (2018). Linking Entropy at Rest with the Underlying Structural Connectivity in the Healthy and Lesioned Brain. Cerebral Cortex, 28(8), 2948–2958. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx176
7. Satterthwaite, T. D., & Baker, J. T. (2015). How can studies of resting-state functional connectivity help us understand psychosis as a disorder of brain development? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 30, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.10.005
8. Uddin, L. Q. (2020). Bring the noise: Reconceptualizing spontaneous neural activity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.003
9. Mediano, P. A. M., Rosas, F. E., Luppi, A. I., Noreika, V., Seth, A. K., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Barnett, L., & Bor, D. (2023). Spectrally and temporally resolved estimation of neural signal diversity. In eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.88683.1
10. Karbasforoushan, H., & Woodward, N. D. (2012). Resting-state networks in schizophrenia. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 12(21), 2404–2414. https://doi.org/10.2174/156802612805289863
No