Empathy development in preschool children: insights from EEG microstate and spectral analyses

Poster No:

642 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Chenbo Wang1, Ruoxi Wu2, Yiming Zhang2

Institutions:

1East China Normal University, Shanghai, Shanghai, 2East China Normal University, Shanghai, China

First Author:

Chenbo Wang  
East China Normal University
Shanghai, Shanghai

Co-Author(s):

Ruoxi Wu  
East China Normal University
Shanghai, China
Yiming Zhang  
East China Normal University
Shanghai, China

Introduction:

Empathy plays a critical role in adaptive social functioning (Decety & Jackson, 2004) and mental health (Jones et al., 2010), raising a pivotal question: How does empathy develop? While substantial evidence highlights the developmental trajectories of empathy across the lifespan (Huang & Su, 2012), the neurophysiological basis underlying these changes remains largely unexplored.

This study examines empathy development in children aged 3–6 years-a critical period for socioemotional growth. Using EEG recordings, we aim to uncover how neural mechanisms support the emergence of empathic abilities during this formative stage.

Methods:

This study recruited 71 preschool children (41 male, 30 female; aged 37–82 months). Participants watched a 5-minute empathy-eliciting animated clip, Partly Cloudy, while EEG signals were recorded. Following the viewing, empathy-related behaviors were assessed using five simple questions.

We leveraged the complementary strengths of spectral analysis (Uhlhaas et al., 2009) and microstate analysis (Michel & Koenig, 2018) to examine neural responses during the naturalistic viewing of the animated clip. For spectral analysis, frequency bands associated with the emotion contagion (EC) and perspective-taking (PT) components of empathy were identified, and their developmental trajectories were tracked across this age range. Concurrently, we analyzed temporal dynamics using five microstates (MS1–MS5), characterizing distinct parameters (e.g., coverage) during empathy-related neural processing and exploring their associations with the cognitive and emotional facets of empathy development.

Results:

The analysis of power spectral density (PSD) revealed distinct spatial patterns associated with empathy-related processing. In the theta band, paired t-tests indicated significantly enhanced PSD during the EC and PT clips compared to the baseline condition (Fig. 1a). Notably, the right occipital theta component showed a negative correlation with age (r = -0.270, p = 0.023; Fig. 1d). Similarly, in the alpha band, PSD was significantly elevated during the EC and PT clips (Fig. 1b), and this increase positively correlated with age across conditions (r = 0.297, p = 0.012; Fig. 1e), suggesting a developmental enhancement in emotional processing capacity.

Microstate analysis identified five representative microstates across subjects in all conditions (Fig. 2a). Paired t-tests revealed that, compared to baseline, EC clips exhibited higher coverage in MS2, MS3, and MS5, along with decreased coverage in MS1 (Fig. 2b). Similarly, PT clips showed increased coverage of MS5 and reduced coverage of MS1 relative to baseline. Notably, MS5 coverage decreased with age (r = -0.33, p = 0.004; Fig. 2c), while transitions from MS5 to MS2 increased with age during PT clips (r = 0.298, p = 0.012).
Supporting Image: Fig1.jpg
Supporting Image: Fig2.jpg
 

Conclusions:

The emotional and cognitive development of empathy abilities with age is reflected in increased alpha-band activity around temporal-parietal regions and corresponding microstates. At the same time, preschool children exhibited faster perceptual processing of empathy, as indicated by a decrease in occipital theta-band activity and its associated microstates with age.

These findings enhance our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying empathy development (Singer et al., 2004), particularly during the preschool years. The current study offers valuable insights for refining theoretical models (de Waal & Preston, 2017) and developing early childhood interventions that promote healthy socioemotional growth.

Emotion, Motivation and Social Neuroscience:

Emotional Learning
Social Cognition 1

Lifespan Development:

Early life, Adolescence, Aging 2

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

EEG/MEG Modeling and Analysis

Keywords:

Development
Electroencephaolography (EEG)
Emotions
Other - Empathy

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Task-activation

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Healthy subjects

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

EEG/ERP

Provide references using APA citation style.

Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100.
Huang, H., & Su, Y. (2012). The development of empathy across the lifespan: A perspective of double processes. Psychological Development and Education, 28, 434–441.
Jones, A. P., et al. (2010). Feeling, caring, knowing: Different types of empathy deficit in boys with psychopathic tendencies and autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(11), 1188–1197.
Michel, C. M., & Koenig, T. (2018). EEG microstates as a tool for studying the temporal dynamics of whole-brain neuronal networks: A review. Neuroimage, 180, 577–593.
Singer, T., et al. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1157–1162.
Uhlhaas, P. J., et al. (2009). The development of neural synchrony reflects late maturation and restructuring of functional networks in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(24), 9866–9871.
de Waal, F. B., & Preston, S. D. (2017). Mammalian empathy: Behavioural manifestations and neural basis. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(8), 498–509.

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No