Linking brain dynamics to neuromodulatory systems using multiscale data and computational modelling

Poster No:

1224 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Saurabh Sonkusare1, Kartik Iyer2, Richa Phogat3, Johan van der Meer2, Luke Hearne4, Sasha Dionisio5, Michael Breakspear3

Institutions:

1The University of Newcastle, Australia, Newcastle, Australia, 2QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Australia, 3The University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 4QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, 5Department of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

First Author:

Saurabh Sonkusare  
The University of Newcastle, Australia
Newcastle, Australia

Co-Author(s):

Kartik Iyer  
QIMR Berghofer
Brisbane, Australia
Richa Phogat, PhD  
The University of Newcastle
New Lambton Heights, NSW
Johan van der Meer  
QIMR Berghofer
Brisbane, Australia
Luke Hearne  
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Herston, Queensland
Sasha Dionisio  
Department of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Michael Breakspear, PhD  
The University of Newcastle
New Lambton Heights, NSW

Introduction:

The brain's dynamics continuously fluctuate between states of functional integration and segregation, reflecting processes operating over multiple time scales. Two key neuromodulatory brainstem nuclei-the locus coeruleus (LC) (adrenergic) and the nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) (cholinergic)-are hypothesized to regulate these integration and segregation states through their widespread and sparse projections across cortical and subcortical systems, respectively. However, direct empirical evidence supporting this hypothesis is lacking. Here, we leverage heart rate-modulated by the adrenergic-cholinergic balance-as a physiological proxy to connect neuromodulatory activity with brain integration and segregation states. We employ a movie-watching paradigm to evoke naturalistic brain responses with separate intracranial EEG (iEEG) and fMRI data acquisition experiments. To bridge these modalities, we use computational modeling to transform iEEG local field potentials (LFPs) into BOLD responses via the Balloon-Windkessel model, enabling validation of the fMRI-derived findings.
Supporting Image: Figure1.png
   ·Figure1. A) Neuromodulatory nuclei linked to integration-segregation states B) Data modalities used in this study C) Analytical approach D) Hypothesis
 

Methods:

We acquired iEEG data from 12 patients with epilepsy and fMRI data from 18 healthy participants while they watched a 20-minute unedited emotional movie, The Butterfly Circus.Study schema shown in Fig 1.
iEEG Analysis:Data was segmented into 5s epochs ensuring each segment had 3-4 heart beats and heart rate computed for each segment. We computed connectivity matrices high-frequency broadband activity (60–140 Hz, measure of local neuronal firing) of gray matter channels. 5 sec epochs were used. Network properties related to integration (global efficiency) and segregation (modularity) from connectivity matrices of each epoch were then obtained.
fMRI Analysis:Standard preprocessing pipelines (van der Meer et al., 2020) were applied. BOLD signals were extracted using an atlas comprising 216 cortical and subcortical regions. Sliding window analysis (~30 seconds) was used to compute dynamic connectivity matrices. Network properties of integration (global efficiency) and segregation (modularity) from connectivity matrices of each epoch were obtained. Heart rate (HR) data corresponding to each TR was derived using the TAPAS toolbox, and dynamic HR signals were similarly segmented with sliding windows.

Group mean correlations were computed to find associations between the integration and segregation time series and their corresponding heart rate. fMRI results were validated on an open-sourcemovie-watching fMRI dataset. Additionally, iEEG signals were transformed into BOLD responses using the Balloon-Windkessel model. This allowed us to replicate the fMRI-based analyses and assess the impact of the inherently slow BOLD signal on its relationship with heart rate.

Results:

Dynamic integration states were positively correlated with HR, and segregation states were negatively correlated with HR (Figure 2A). Notably, in fMRI data acquired from the participants viewing the same movie, we find the opposite pattern of results i.e. integration states associated with low heart rate and segregation states associated with high heart rate (Figure 2B). This was validated with an open access fMRI movie watching dataset (Figure 2C). Work on computational modelling is currently in progress.
Supporting Image: Figure2.png
   ·Figure1. A) iEEG integration states linked with high heart rate, segregation states linked with low heart rate B) fMRI results showing integration linked with low heart rate and vice versa
 

Conclusions:

We established with direct neuronal activity that integrations states were linked with higher heart rate and segregation states linked with lower heart rate. Thus, our results also indirectly link brain network states to activity in neuromodulatory systems of LC and NBM. However, we found opposing pattern of results with fMRI which was validated with another fMRI dataset. These opposing findings from iEEG and fMRI highlight the complex relationship between the cortical activity, BOLD signals and cardiac homeostasis. Results from computational modelling may reveal if the opposing pattern of results we found with fMRI are inherent due to the slow nature of haemodynamic BOLD responses.

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural) 1
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 2

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

BOLD fMRI
EEG
Imaging Methods Other

Keywords:

Acetylcholine
Adrenaline
Computational Neuroscience
ELECTROCORTICOGRAPHY
FUNCTIONAL MRI
Modeling

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Task-activation

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Patients

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Functional MRI
Computational modeling
Other, Please specify  -   intracranial EEG

For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?

3.0T

Provide references using APA citation style.

Shine, J. M. (2019). Neuromodulatory influences on integration and segregation in the brain. Trends in cognitive sciences, 23(7), 572-583.

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No