Poster No:
514
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Marie Hedo1, Louisa Schilling2, S. Parker Singleton3, Keith Jamison4, Amy Kuceyeski1
Institutions:
1Cornell, Ithaca, NY, 2Weill Cornell Medicine, new york, NY, 3University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 4Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Introduction:
Adolescence is a critical developmental period characterized by profound environmental, social, and neurological changes, along with an increased vulnerability to psychopathology. Recent shifts in clinical and research paradigms have embraced a dimensional approach to psychopathology. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) proposes a hierarchical framework, with a general susceptibility to psychiatric disorders at the top, branching into progressively specific dimensions (Kotov et al., 2017). While previous research has identified structural and functional brain differences associated with psychopathology dimensions, much remains unclear, hindering the development of effective intervention and prevention strategies (Royer et al., 2024; Voldsbekk et al., 2023). Moreover, studies examining sex-specific neural correlates of psychopathology are limited. While most research has focused separately on structural and functional MRI data, emerging evidence underscores the importance of structure-function coupling in understanding brain-behavior relationships.
In this study, we investigated the associations between functional brain activity dynamics and childhood psychopathology in boys and girls using multimodal imaging data and network control theory (NCT) tools. Our objectives were to (1) determine whether network and regional transition energies (TEs) are associated with different psychopathology dimensions and (2) explore sex-specific differences in these associations.
Methods:
We utilized baseline imaging and behavioral data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, including 1,227 girls and 1,073 boys. Resting-state fMRI data were parcellated into 86 regions using the Desikan-Killiany atlas combined with subcortical structures. Brain states were identified using k-means clustering, and an average structural connectome was reconstructed using diffusion-weighted imaging and probabilistic tractography. NCT was applied to compute regional TEs for transitions between the identified brain states. Principal component analysis (PCA) on the five DSM-V-oriented scales of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) yielded three components, representing different aspects of psychopathology: (1) general susceptibility to disorders (PC1), (2) a contrast between internalizing and externalizing symptoms (PC2), and (3) ADHD-related symptoms (PC3).
Linear mixed-effects models (LMEM) were used to assess associations between TEs, sex, and psychopathology dimensions, adjusting for covariates including age, handedness, income-to-needs ratio, and framewise displacement, with imaging site as a random effect. Significant disorder-by-sex interactions were further analyzed using post hoc two-sample t-tests.
Results:
Our findings revealed that higher externalizing symptoms (PC2) were associated with increased TEs in the somatomotor network, while internalizing symptoms (PC2 × sex interaction) were linked to lower TEs in the limbic network, but only in girls. General psychopathology (PC1) was associated with increased TEs in parietal and temporal regions. Internalizing symptoms were positively associated with TEs in subcortical, temporal, and parietal regions, whereas ADHD-related symptoms (PC3) were linked to increased TEs in the inferior parietal and cingulate cortices.
Conclusions:
These results highlight that structure-function coupling is altered across psychopathology dimensions in childhood and emphasize the influence of sex on these relationships. Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating sex-specific analyses to better understand the neural correlates of childhood psychopathology.
Disorders of the Nervous System:
Psychiatric (eg. Depression, Anxiety, Schizophrenia) 1
Lifespan Development:
Early life, Adolescence, Aging
Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:
Multi-Modal Imaging 2
Keywords:
Development
DISORDERS
FUNCTIONAL MRI
Modeling
Psychiatric
Psychiatric Disorders
Tractography
WHITE MATTER IMAGING - DTI, HARDI, DSI, ETC
Other - youth
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Resting state
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Patients
Was this research conducted in the United States?
Yes
Are you Internal Review Board (IRB) certified?
Please note: Failure to have IRB, if applicable will lead to automatic rejection of abstract.
No, I do not have IRB or AUCC approval
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Functional MRI
Diffusion MRI
Behavior
Neuropsychological testing
For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?
3.0T
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
Free Surfer
Provide references using APA citation style.
1. Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., Brown, T. A., Carpenter, W. T., Caspi, A., Clark, L. A., Eaton, N. R., Forbes, M. K., Forbush, K. T., Goldberg, D., Hasin, D., Hyman, S. E., Ivanova, M. Y., Lynam, D. R., Markon, K., . . . Zimmerman, M. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258
2. Michelini, G., Barch, D. M., Tian, Y., Watson, D., Klein, D. N., & Kotov, R. (2019). Delineating and validating higher-order dimensions of psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Translational Psychiatry, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0593-4
3. Royer, J., Kebets, V., Piguet, C., Chen, J., Ooi, L. Q. R., Kirschner, M., Siffredi, V., Misic, B., Yeo, B. T., & Bernhardt, B. C. (2023). Multimodal neural correlates of childhood psychopathology. bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.02.530821
4. Voldsbekk, I., Kjelkenes, R., Dahl, A., Holm, M. C., Lund, M. J., Kaufmann, T., Tamnes, C. K., Andreassen, O. A., Westlye, L. T., & Alnæs, D. (2023). Delineating disorder-general and disorder-specific dimensions of psychopathology from functional brain networks in a developmental clinical sample. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 62, 101271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101271
No