Poster No:
322
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Ningning Liu1, Yinshan Wang2, Zixuan Zhou2, Peng Gao2, Xinyi Zhang1, Ziqing Zhu1, Yuan Gao1, Li-Zhen Chen2, Haimei Li1, Changxi Ju1, Yufeng Wang1, Lu Liu1, Qiujin Qian1, Xi-Nian Zuo2, Lifespan Brain Chart Consortium2
Institutions:
1Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, Beijing, 2State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, Beijing
First Author:
Ningning Liu
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing
Co-Author(s):
Yinshan Wang
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, Beijing
Zixuan Zhou
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, Beijing
Peng Gao
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, Beijing
Xinyi Zhang
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing
Ziqing Zhu
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing
Yuan Gao
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing
Li-Zhen Chen
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, Beijing
Haimei Li
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing
Changxi Ju
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing
Yufeng Wang
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing
Lu Liu
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing
Qiujin Qian
Peking University Sixth Hospital
Beijing, Beijing
Xi-Nian Zuo
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University
Beijing, Beijing
Introduction:
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder (Shaw et al., 2010). According to the DSM-5, ADHD symptoms must be inconsistent with the individual's developmental level (APA, 2013). Currently, this inconsistency is assessed subjectively by physicians rather than through objective, developmentally aligned criteria, largely due to a limited understanding of the neurodevelopmental mechanisms underlying ADHD. The differences between ADHD developmental levels and typical development remain unclear. Recent neuroimaging advancements have sought to clarify these traits, indicating that ADHD reflects a delay in brain development (Shaw et al., 2018; Shaw et al., 2007; Shaw et al., 2012; Hoogman et al., 2017; Hoogman et al., 2019). However, this delay has a small effect size and is insufficient for clinical applications, partly due to ADHD's high heterogeneity. Recent studies have aimed to classify ADHD subtypes based on pathophysiological mechanisms to improve clinical translation (Bu et al., 2024; Costa et al., 2015; Feng et al., 2024; Lecei et al., 2019). While these studies support distinct neurodevelopmental subtypes, the absence of reliable, globally-consistent metrics for normative neurodevelopmental deviations limits broader applicability, complicating the identification of relevant mechanisms and the explanation of varied developmental characteristics. This study uses normative brain charts from 123,984 structural MRI scans (Bethlehem et al., 2022) and extensive multimodal data, including genetic, brain, behavioral, and environmental measurements, to explore ADHD neurodiversity.
Methods:
After quality control and processing, we calculated centile scores for brain morphology in 270 children with ADHD (ages 6-17), all diagnosed by two psychiatrists. We identified deviations from the normative model and clustered ADHD individuals using partitioning around medoids to uncover trait constellations underlying ADHD's clinical heterogeneity. We compared multidimensional data, including clinical symptoms, neurocognitive outcomes, brain function, and genetic and environmental risk factors, to dissect this heterogeneity and support tailored early diagnosis or therapeutic approaches from a population neuroscience perspective (Figure 1).
Results:
Analysis revealed widespread regional deviations in cortical volume among children with ADHD, highlighting significant individual differences. Further investigation identified two subgroups with distinct brain development patterns: delayed brain growth (DBG-ADHD) and precocious brain growth (PBG-ADHD). The DBG-ADHD subgroup exhibited notable neurocognitive impairments and higher functional homotopy within the default-mode network, frequently implicated in ADHD research. Differentially expressed genes in this group were related to neurodevelopment, with various prenatal risk factors affecting brain development. In contrast, PBG-ADHD was linked to increased disruptive behaviors, higher functional homotopy in language and somatomotor networks, and neurogenesis-related genetic pathways, with no significant prenatal environmental risk factors noted (Figure 2).
Conclusions:
Children with ADHD exhibit considerable individual variation in brain development, characterized by two distinct subgroups with different developmental traits despite similar clinical symptoms. One subgroup shows comprehensive developmental delays likely due to genetic and prenatal environmental factors, while the other presents congenital brain abnormalities possibly from atypical brain morphogenesis or adverse environmental influences, often associated with disruptive behaviors. These findings provide crucial insights into ADHD's neurodevelopmental diversity.
Disorders of the Nervous System:
Neurodevelopmental/ Early Life (eg. ADHD, autism) 1
Lifespan Development:
Normal Brain Development: Fetus to Adolescence 2
Keywords:
Attention Deficit Disorder
Other - growth chart, genetics; environment; interhemispheric communication
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Resting state
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Patients
Was this research conducted in the United States?
No
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Functional MRI
Structural MRI
Behavior
Neuropsychological testing
For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?
3.0T
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
AFNI
FSL
Free Surfer
Other, Please list
-
Matlab
Provide references using APA citation style.
References:
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, DC (2013): American psychiatric association.
Bethlehem, R. (2022). Brain charts for the human lifespan [Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Nature, 604(7906), 525-533.
Bu, X. (2024). Normative growth modeling of brain morphology reveals neuroanatomical heterogeneity and biological subtypes in children with ADHD. bioRxiv, 2023-2024.
Costa, D. T. (2015). Characterizing heterogeneity in children with and without ADHD based on reward system connectivity [Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural]. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 155-174.
Feng, A. (2024). Functional imaging derived ADHD biotypes based on deep clustering: a study on personalized medication therapy guidance. Eclinicalmedicine
Lecei, A. (2019). Can we use neuroimaging data to differentiate between subgroups of children with ADHD symptoms: A proof of concept study using latent class analysis of brain activity [Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Neuroimage-Clinical, 21, 101601.
Shaw, P. (2010). Childhood psychiatric disorders as anomalies in neurodevelopmental trajectories [Journal Article; Review]. Human Brain Mapping, 31(6), 917-925.
No