Poster No:
985
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Dawn Jensen1, Vince Calhoun2, Jingyu Liu3
Institutions:
1Georgia State University, Austell, GA, 2GSU/GATech/Emory, Atlanta, GA, 3GSU, Atlanta, GA
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Introduction:
Adolescence is known to be a crucial development period hallmarked by rapid and diverse neural maturation. Disruption of this process due to the experience of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can lead to the emergence of mental illness later in life. Cross sectional research has shown that children experiencing trauma do have significant differences in their brain development, but we currently lack a clear understanding of how the chronicity and severity of ACEs might affect the brain over time. To explore this, we used a longitudinal sample of adolescents from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study, which contains measures reflecting ACEs (N = 11k, 4 timepoints, ages 9-14) as well as image results that reflect white matter integrity (fractional anisotropy (FA), N= 8k, 2 timepoints).
Methods:
ACEs reported were grouped into three categories of abuse, neglect, and trauma. These were used in a latent class growth analysis to find significantly different subgroups of trajectories that reflect the chronicity and severity of participants experience of ACEs across time. Sex and the Child Opportunity Index (COI) were included as covariates (subjects are already grouped by age). Best model fit (linear or non-linear) was determined by appropriate convergence of the model, log-likelihood, and BIC criteria. The white matter measures were obtained from diffusion MRI using AtlasTracks to extract the average measure of FA in the white matter tracts. These were the dependent variables in a repeated measures linear mixed-effects model that included time, sex and ACEs subgrouping as covariates. Bonferroni corrections were applied to account for multiple testing.
Results:
A three-class non-linear model was found to best fit the data, representing significantly differing trajectories for a group of participants with low to no ACEs (54%), a group of participants experiencing an intermediately increasing level of ACEs (39%), and a group experiencing a much higher level of ACEs also increasing across time (6%). These trajectories are shown in Figure 1. In the high-level group, sex showed significant effects, with males experienced more ACEs across time. No sex differences were found in the low- and intermediate-level groups. COI was inversely related to the increase in ACEs across time. The linear mixed-effects models showed the expected time and sex influences on white matter development in addition to significant relationships between FA measures and ACEs' subgroups in the right superior longitudinal fasciculus (t = -2.68, p<0.007) and the right arcuate fasciculus (t= -2.84, p<0.004). These regions are highlighted in Figure 2. In both tracts, subjects in the low to no ACEs group had lower FA values than the subjects in the highest ACEs groups


Conclusions:
This analysis allowed the classification of a large cohort of adolescents into subgroups based on the severity and chronicity of their experiences of adverse experiences that highlighted sex differences as well as the impact of sociodemographic factors. Subjects who had the most severe and chronic ACEs showed greater development of their white matter in tracts responsible for attention, executive functioning, and language. These findings further support the stress acceleration hypothesis of advanced brain development in the face of hardship. Future work will include a parallel-process latent class growth analysis to consider the development of internalizing and externalizing behaviors with respect to ACEs and how those may impact the developmental trajectories of the brain in adolescence.
Funded by: CREST D-MAP, Dynamic Multiscale and Multimodal Brain Mapping across the Lifespan: HDR #2112455.
Lifespan Development:
Early life, Adolescence, Aging 1
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Diffusion MRI Modeling and Analysis 2
Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Normal Development
White Matter Anatomy, Fiber Pathways and Connectivity
Keywords:
Data analysis
Development
Open Data
White Matter
WHITE MATTER IMAGING - DTI, HARDI, DSI, ETC
Other - Adverse Childhood Experiences
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Other
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Healthy subjects
Was this research conducted in the United States?
Yes
Are you Internal Review Board (IRB) certified?
Please note: Failure to have IRB, if applicable will lead to automatic rejection of abstract.
Not applicable
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Diffusion MRI
Behavior
For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?
3.0T
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
AFNI
Free Surfer
Other, Please list
-
mPlus
FSL
Provide references using APA citation style.
not applicable
No