Presented During:
Thursday, June 26, 2025: 11:30 AM - 12:45 PM
Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre
Room:
M4 (Mezzanine Level)
Poster No:
2031
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Kirill Nourski1, Mitchell Steinschneider1, Ariane Rhone1, Matthew Howard1
Institutions:
1The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Introduction:
Auditory cortex on the superior temporal plane and lateral convexity are key areas in the initial stages of cortical processing of sounds. More complex perceptual representations are envisioned to occur in auditory-related cortex along the ventral and dorsal processing streams, extending into prefrontal cortex and ultimately leading to behavior. To characterize the flow of information across these stages of the auditory hierarchy that ultimately leads to sensory-driven behavioral events, we examined neural activity using intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) during semantic categorization tasks.
Methods:
Participants were 42 neurosurgical patients undergoing iEEG monitoring for medically intractable epilepsy. Stimuli were 300 ms monosyllabic words, with participants pressing a button in response to words belonging to a target category ("animal" or "number"). We examined iEEG data by analyzing high gamma (70-150 Hz) power. Event-related band power, normalized to a prestimulus baseline within 100-200 ms prior to the stimulus onset, was measured in two windows: (1) 50-300 ms after stimulus onset and (2) 250-0 ms before motor response. Trials with reaction times of <550 ms were excluded from the analysis to avoid the overlap between the two windows. Two distinct patterns were identified: (1) significant activity in the first, but not second window ("stimulus-related") and significant activity in the second, but not first window ("behavior-related") (Fig. 1). Cortical regions of interest (ROIs) were characterized in terms of bias towards one pattern vs. the other, calculated for individual as the difference between the numbers of sites with behavior- and stimulus-related activity divided by their sum (Fig. 2).


Results:
Over 6000 recording sites across 52 ROIs were examined. Stimulus-related pattern was considerably more common than behavior-related. Behavior-related pattern was sparsely represented throughout the brain. It had the highest prevalence in the prefrontal cortex, a more limited representation in anterior temporal lobe and sensorimotor cortex, and was practically absent in the superior temporal cortex. Interestingly, despite the occurrence of behavior-related activity in sensorimotor cortex, stimulus-related pattern remained more common there. Hemispheric asymmetries were prominent in this semantic classification task. Stimulus-related activity had a higher prevalence in the right hemisphere compared to the left (left: 525/3111 sites, right: 580/3050 sites, p=0.0285; Chi-squared test). By contrast, behavior-related responses were more common in the left hemisphere than in the right (left: 63/3111; right: 29/3050; p=0.000509; Chi-squared test). Pars triangularis of the inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus and anterior temporal lobe all had a stronger bias weighted towards behavior-related activity in the left hemisphere. Additionally, orbital gyrus had the highest bias towards behavior-related activity bilaterally. Pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus exhibited a more balanced representation of the two activity patterns bilaterally.
Conclusions:
There is a transformation from stimulus-related activity in auditory cortex towards a more balanced mixture of stimulus- and behavior-related patterns in prefrontal and anterior temporal regions. This transition primarily occurs in the left hemisphere. Results reveal progressive stages of cortical auditory processing wherein sensory stimulus-driven responses are ultimately transformed into activity driving subsequent behavior. Additional studies requiring more complex semantic processing will evaluate whether these findings can be generalized or if profiles dynamically change as a function of the task.
Language:
Speech Perception 2
Perception, Attention and Motor Behavior:
Perception: Auditory/ Vestibular 1
Keywords:
Other - High gamma; iEEG; Superior temporal gyrus
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Task-activation
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Patients
Was this research conducted in the United States?
Yes
Are you Internal Review Board (IRB) certified?
Please note: Failure to have IRB, if applicable will lead to automatic rejection of abstract.
Yes, I have IRB or AUCC approval
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Other, Please specify
-
iEEG
Provide references using APA citation style.
not applicable
No