Poster No:
2126
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Jessica Royer1, Donna Gift Cabalo2, Raúl Rodríguez-Cruces2, Ella Sahlas2, Casey Paquola3, Sofie Valk4, Birgit Frauscher5, Boris Bernhardt2
Institutions:
1McGill University, Montreal, QC, 2McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, 32Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-7, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, North Rhine-Westphalia, 4Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Saxony, 5Duke University School of Medicine, Durhan, NC
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Casey Paquola
2Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-7, Forschungszentrum Jülich
Jülich, North Rhine-Westphalia
Sofie Valk
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Leipzig, Saxony
Introduction:
The insula is involved in diverse sensory, visceral, cognitive, and socio-affective functions [1-3] supported by intricate connectivity patterns [4-6] and microanatomical properties [7,8]. While invasive electrical stimulation studies and functional neuroimaging suggest convergent functional organization in this region, it remains unclear how the insula's resting subregional dynamics relate to its connectivity profiles. The present work explores this question by cross-referencing neurophysiological data with ultra-high field MRI to track insular function with unprecedented spatiotemporal precision.
Methods:
The MNI open iEEG atlas [9] provides iEEG recordings acquired during conditions of resting wakefulness in 106 patients with intractable epilepsy (Fig1A). By excluding channels involved in ictal and inter-ictal activity, this dataset provides a putative reference space for normal human neurophysiology. Data pre-processing included band-pass filtering (0.5-80Hz), downsampling (200Hz), and demeaning. We first computed the band power (delta [δ]: 0.5-4Hz; theta [θ]: 4-8Hz; alpha [α]: 8-13Hz; beta [β]: 13-30Hz; gamma [γ]: 30-80Hz) of each channel. The spatial coverage of each channel was expanded by 5mm along the cortical surface ("channel region"), resulting in complete coverage of the insula delineated by labels of the aparc parcellation [10]. For each channel, band power values were normalized so their total would equal one. Normalized band power was computed at each vertex by averaging corresponding values of overlapping channel regions (Fig1B). Resulting normalized band power maps were then cross-referenced with resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) data of participants scanned using 7 Tesla MRI and included in the MICA-PNI dataset (n=10, 3 sessions each; 4/6 M/F, age=26.6±4.6 years) [11] and decoded across established functional network communities [12]. Functional timeseries were smoothed along the cortical surface (FWHM=5mm), and sessions were concatenated for each participant. Mixed effects models were implemented via BrainStat13 and findings were corrected for multiple comparisons using random field theory.

·Figure 1
Results:
The insular cortex showed diverse neurophysiological properties (Fig1B). We observed prominent delta band activity in ventral anterior and middle subregions. Theta and alpha band activity were highest in posterior regions, while beta power was relatively elevated across large portions of the mid- and anterior insula. High gamma-range activity was present in dorsal anterior and posterior subregions. Thresholded normalized band power maps (top 15%) were used to define bilateral, homologous seeds to map subregional functional connectivity constrained by local iEEG dynamics. Functional connectivity analyses leveraging rs-fMRI showed that subregional physiology reflects the insula's broad network embedding. This approach showed variable connectivity profiles to somatomotor, dorsal attention, salience, and frontoparietal networks (Fig2A), consistent with prior functional imaging studies. Benchmarking connectivity profiles of neurophysiological seeds against those of the whole insula showed significantly enhanced connectivity of delta and gamma subregions with mesiotemporal and anterior cingulate cortices, respectively. Theta and alpha band seeds were associated with higher connectivity to pre- and postcentral gyri, while beta-dominant subregions displayed stronger frontoparietal connectivity (Fig2B; all pFWE<0.01).

·Figure 2
Conclusions:
These findings demonstrate that the insula's neurophysiological properties are closely associated with its subregional functional connectivity and neurocognitive specialization. The observed coupling between specific frequency bands and distinct large-scale networks provides novel insights into the insula's functional organization. This work underscores the utility of integrating invasive electrophysiology with ultra-high field MRI to decode fine-grained brain dynamics.
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural)
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 2
Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Anatomy and Functional Systems
Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission Other 1
Keywords:
ADULTS
Cortex
Electroencephaolography (EEG)
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
FUNCTIONAL MRI
Systems
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Resting state
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Patients
Was this research conducted in the United States?
No
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Functional MRI
EEG/ERP
Structural MRI
For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?
7T
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
AFNI
FSL
Other, Please list
-
Micapipe, fastsurfer
Provide references using APA citation style.
1 Chang, L. J., Yarkoni, T., Khaw, M. W. & Sanfey, A. G. Decoding the role of the insula in human cognition: functional parcellation and large-scale reverse inference. Cerebral cortex 23, 739-749 (2013).
2 Kelly, C. et al. A convergent functional architecture of the insula emerges across imaging modalities. Neuroimage 61, 1129-1142 (2012).
3 Uddin, L. Q., Kinnison, J., Pessoa, L. & Anderson, M. L. Beyond the tripartite cognition–emotion–interoception model of the human insular cortex. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 26, 16-27 (2014).
4 Deen, B., Pitskel, N. B. & Pelphrey, K. A. Three systems of insular functional connectivity identified with cluster analysis. Cerebral cortex 21, 1498-1506 (2011).
5 Ghaziri, J. et al. Subcortical structural connectivity of insular subregions. Scientific reports 8, 8596 (2018).
6 Tian, Y. & Zalesky, A. Characterizing the functional connectivity diversity of the insula cortex: Subregions, diversity curves and behavior. NeuroImage 183, 716-733 (2018).
7 Royer, J. et al. Myeloarchitecture gradients in the human insula: Histological underpinnings and association to intrinsic functional connectivity. Neuroimage 216, 116859 (2020).
8 Morel, A., Gallay, M., Baechler, A., Wyss, M. & Gallay, D. The human insula: architectonic organization and postmortem MRI registration. Neuroscience 236, 117-135 (2013).
9 Frauscher, B. et al. Atlas of the normal intracranial electroencephalogram: neurophysiological awake activity in different cortical areas. Brain 141, 1130-1144 (2018). https://doi.org:10.1093/brain/awy035
10 Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774-781 (2012).
11 Cabalo, D. G. et al. Multimodal Precision Neuroimaging of the Individual Human Brain at Ultra-high fields. bioRxiv, 2024.2006. 2017.596303 (2024).
12 Yeo, B. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. Journal of neurophysiology (2011).
13 Larivière, S. et al. BrainStat: A toolbox for brain-wide statistics and multimodal feature associations. Neuroimage 266, 119807 (2023).
No