Poster No:
1674
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Chloe Retika1, Gaon Kim1, Paul Thompson2, Katherine Lawrence1
Institutions:
1USC, Marina Del Rey, CA, 2University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Introduction:
Reward systems are impacted in neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders that occur during development, such as autism and depression. However, it is not yet fully understood how individual differences during development relate to functional connectivity of the reward system. In this study, we examined 7,080 subjects in late childhood from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) database to begin characterizing these individual differences. We focused on functional connectivity of a core structure in the reward system – the nucleus accumbens (NAc) – and a measure of social functioning, the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS).
Methods:
We analyzed resting-state brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data from 7080 children available through the ABCD study (9-10 years, 49.3% female), a population-based study of brain development spanning 21 sites. Participants were included in our analyses if they had complete rsfMRI scans acquired on 3T scanners, covariate demographic data (sex, scanner, parental education, household income), and SRS scores. Subjects who did not pass rsfMRI quality control were excluded. Additionally, due to statistical models failing to converge when including relatedness as a random effect, only one child was randomly retained from each sibling pair.
The traits measured by the SRS include social skills – such as an individual's ability to recognize social cues, interpret social behavior, reciprocate social communication, demonstrate social motivation – and the amount of displayed stereotypic behavior; SRS scores are elevated in autism, but normally distributed across the population.
Complete rsfMRI acquisition and processing protocols are detailed elsewhere (Hagler, 2019). Briefly, rsfMRI data was acquired using multiband echo-planar imaging with a slice acceleration factor of 6 (15-20 minutes, 2.4 mm isotropic, TR=800 ms) (Hagler, 2019). Standard rsfMRI pre-processing was completed, excluding motion-contaminated volumes based on a threshold of 0.3 mm displacement (Power, 2014). For each pair of 333 Gordon parcellation ROIs – which are derived from 13 distinct networks (Gordon, 2016) – correlation values were Fisher transformed into z-statistics and averaged to provide a summary of correlation strength for each network (Van Dijk, 2010). The 13 cortical resting-state networks from the Gordon parcellation included: auditory, cingulo-opercular, cingulo-parietal, default mode (DMN), dorsal attention, fronto-parietal, none, retrosplenial, salience, sensorimotor mouth, sensorimotor hand, ventral attention, and visual (Gordon, 2016).
Using linear mixed effects models, we evaluated the association between total SRS scores and NAc functional connectivity with each cortical brain network, averaging between the left and right NAc. The false discovery rate was used to correct for multiple comparisons. In the regression, fixed effects included sex, household income, highest parental education, age, and total SRS scores. Scanner was designated as a random effect to account for between scanner variation.
Results:
Higher total scores on the SRS were associated with greater functional connectivity between the NAc and the DMN (corrected p=0.0069, β=0.039) (Figure 1). There were no significant associations between SRS scores and NAc connectivity with any other examined cortical network.

·Total scores on the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) are significantly associated with functional connectivity between the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and default mode network (DMN).
Conclusions:
We found that individual differences in social functioning across the population during childhood were related to nuanced individual alterations in the functional connectivity of a key reward structure, the NAc. These findings lay a groundwork for beginning to understand how subtle individual differences in the reward system are related to human behavior across health and disease.
Disorders of the Nervous System:
Neurodevelopmental/ Early Life (eg. ADHD, autism) 2
Lifespan Development:
Early life, Adolescence, Aging
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling
Task-Independent and Resting-State Analysis 1
Keywords:
Autism
FUNCTIONAL MRI
PEDIATRIC
Other - rsfMRI; Functional Connectivity
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Resting state
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Healthy subjects
Was this research conducted in the United States?
Yes
Are you Internal Review Board (IRB) certified?
Please note: Failure to have IRB, if applicable will lead to automatic rejection of abstract.
Yes, I have IRB or AUCC approval
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Functional MRI
Neuropsychological testing
For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?
3.0T
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
AFNI
FSL
Free Surfer
Provide references using APA citation style.
1. Gordon, E. M. (2016). Generation and evaluation of a cortical area parcellation from resting-state correlations. Cerebral Cortex, 26(1), 288–303.
2. Hagler, D. J. (2019). Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. NeuroImage, 202, 116091.
3. Power, J.D. (2014). Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. NeuroImage, 84, 320-341.
4. Van Dijk, K.R. (2010). Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 297-321.
No