T1/2w ratio similarity networks: biological validation and age-related change in the common marmoset

Poster No:

1745 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Ed Hutchings1, Steve Sawiak2, Angela Roberts2, Richard Bethlehem3, Edward Bullmore4

Institutions:

1University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridge, 2University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, 3Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridge, 4Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge, Cambridge

First Author:

Ed Hutchings  
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, Cambridge

Co-Author(s):

Steve Sawiak  
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire
Angela Roberts  
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire
Richard Bethlehem  
Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge
Cambridge, Cambridge
Edward Bullmore  
Department of Psychiatry
Cambridge, Cambridge

Introduction:

Understanding developmental changes in brain structure is a key goal of psychiatry as the peak incidence of many mental disorders falls in adolescence. MRI enables non-invasive imaging of brain structural networks, where regions are modelled as nodes and connections as edges [1]. Structural similarity networks, based on statistical relationships between regional morphological features [2], have revealed distinct developmental processes within paralimbic and isocortical regions [3]. Perturbation to these processes may underlie globally reduced structural similarity seen in psychosis [4].

Morphometric Inverse Divergence (MIND), a novel method for estimating structural similarity from MRI, captures known aspects of biology and outperforms DTI in age prediction tasks [5]. However, similarity networks generated from multiple features can be hard to interpret. Here, we generate MIND similarity networks using T1/2w ratio, interpretable as a measure of myelin [6], and assess 1) whether networks are biologically valid and 2) what age-related changes are present in these networks. We use the common marmoset as an animal model due to an abundance of openly accessible biological data against which to validate T1/2w networks.

Methods:

For biological validation, we used an ex vivo T1/2w template image generated from N=27 adult marmosets [7]. Age-related changes were assessed using a cross-sectional T1/2w dataset [8]. Images were parcellated according to [9], with 116 regions per cortical hemisphere. Similarity between regional T1/2w voxel distributions was estimated using MIND [6].

Multiple linear regressions were used to assess age-related change in two regional metrics: mean T1/2w and weighted degree (mean edge weight of a region) from 0.62-2.5 years, with age and sex as covariates. In the T1/2w analysis, mean cortical T1/2w was also used as a covariate to remove the effects of scanner fluctuations in global T1/2w. In the degree analysis, mean edge weight was used as a covariate to remove confounding effects of brain size [5].

Results:

T1/2w similarity networks (Fig 1A) recapitulate known biological relationships. We find that regions belonging to the same cortical class are significantly more similar (Fig 1B, p=0.042). T1/2w similarity networks are significantly correlated with tract tracing (r=0.25, p<0.001, Fig 1C). Cell type-specific correlated gene expression (CGE) networks were generated from 12 cortical regions using transcriptomic data from [10]. Regions with more similar T1/2w distributions share more similar expression of oligodendrocyte genes (r=0.54, p<0.001, Fig 1D).

Age related changes. Changes in mean T1/2w (Fig 2Ai) were anticorrelated with a region's hierarchical position at the trend level (Fig 2Aii, r=-0.55, p=0.07). Highly laminated and primary sensory areas showed largest rates of T1/2w increase, while poorly laminated and association areas showed the smallest (Fig 2Aiii). Trends in degree change were distinct to changes in mean T1/2w (Fig 2Bi). On average, highly laminated cortical classes showed decreases in degree, while less laminated classes increased, though with notable heterogeneity within classes (Fig 2Bii). Change in mean T1/2w showed an inverse-quadratic relationship with change in degree: brain regions at the extremes of T1/2w change showed decreases in degree, while regions near the median showed increases (Fig 2Biii).
Supporting Image: fig1.png
   ·Similarity network generation and biological validation
Supporting Image: fig2.png
   ·Age-related change in mean T1/2w and average similarity (degree)
 

Conclusions:

T1/2w similarity networks are biologically valid. T1/2w increases along a sensory-association axis in marmoset, in line with findings in human [10], however T1/2w similarity shows distinct age-related changes. Less laminated cortical classes increase in similarity relative to the rest of the cortex over adolescence, in line with findings in human [3], though there was notable heterogeneity within classes. Ongoing work will further characterise age-related changes in T1/2w networks at the edge level.

Disorders of the Nervous System:

Neurodevelopmental/ Early Life (eg. ADHD, autism)

Lifespan Development:

Early life, Adolescence, Aging

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Connectivity (eg. functional, effective, structural) 2

Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:

Normal Development 1

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

Anatomical MRI

Keywords:

Cortex
Cross-Species Homologues
Morphometrics
MRI
Myelin
STRUCTURAL MRI
Other - Primate

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Other

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Healthy subjects

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Structural MRI
Postmortem anatomy
Computational modeling

Which processing packages did you use for your study?

FSL
Other, Please list  -   ANTs

Provide references using APA citation style.

[10] Baum, G. L., Flournoy, J. C., Glasser, M. F., Harms, M. P., Mair, P., Sanders, A. F. P., Barch, D. M., Buckner, R. L., Bookheimer, S., Dapretto, M., Smith, S., Thomas, K. M., Yacoub, E., Van Essen, D. C., & Somerville, L. H. (2022). Graded Variation in T1w/T2w Ratio during Adolescence: Measurement, Caveats, and Implications for Development of Cortical Myelin. The Journal of Neuroscience, 42(29), 5681–5694. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2380-21.2022
[1] Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2575
[3] Dorfschmidt, L., Váša, F., White, S. R., Romero-García, R., Kitzbichler, M. G., Alexander-Bloch, A., Cieslak, M., Mehta, K., Satterthwaite, T. D., The NSPN Consortium, Bethlehem, R. A. I., Seidlitz, J., Vértes, P. E., Bullmore, E. T., Bullmore, E., Dolan, R., Goodyer, I., Fonagy, P., Jones, P., … Bethlehem, R. A. I. (2024). Human adolescent brain similarity development is different for paralimbic versus neocortical zones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(33), e2314074121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2314074121
[6] Glasser, M. F., & Van Essen, D. C. (2011). Mapping Human Cortical Areas In Vivo Based on Myelin Content as Revealed by T1- and T2-Weighted MRI. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(32), 11597–11616. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2180-11.2011
[8] Hata, J., Nakae, K., Tsukada, H., Woodward, A., Haga, Y., Iida, M., Uematsu, A., Seki, F., Ichinohe, N., Gong, R., Kaneko, T., Yoshimaru, D., Watakabe, A., Abe, H., Tani, T., Hamda, H. T., Gutierrez, C. E., Skibbe, H., Maeda, M., … Okano, H. (2023). Multi-modal brain magnetic resonance imaging database covering marmosets with a wide age range. Scientific Data, 10(1), 221. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02121-2
[10] Krienen, F. M., Levandowski, K. M., Zaniewski, H., Del Rosario, R. C. H., Schroeder, M. E., Goldman, M., Wienisch, M., Lutservitz, A., Beja-Glasser, V. F., Chen, C., Zhang, Q., Chan, K. Y., Li, K. X., Sharma, J., McCormack, D., Shin, T. W., Harrahill, A., Nyase, E., Mudhar, G., … Feng, G. (2023). A marmoset brain cell census reveals regional specialization of cellular identities. Science Advances, 9(41), eadk3986. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk3986
[7] Liu, C., Yen, C. C.-C., Szczupak, D., Tian, X., Glen, D., & Silva, A. C. (2021). Marmoset Brain Mapping V3: Population multi-modal standard volumetric an

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No