Poster No:
687
Submission Type:
Abstract Submission
Authors:
Philippe Jawinski1, Helena Forstbach1, Holger Kirsten2, Frauke Beyer3, Arno Villringer3, Veronica Witte4, Markus Scholz2, Stephan Ripke5, Sebastian Markett1
Institutions:
1Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Germany, Leipzig, Germany, 3Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, 4Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig Medical Center & Department of Neurology, Max Planck Inst, Leipzig, Germany, 5Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technolog, Cambridge, MA
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Holger Kirsten
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Germany
Leipzig, Germany
Frauke Beyer
Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Leipzig, Germany
Arno Villringer
Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Leipzig, Germany
Veronica Witte
Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig Medical Center & Department of Neurology, Max Planck Inst
Leipzig, Germany
Markus Scholz
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Germany
Leipzig, Germany
Stephan Ripke
Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technolog
Cambridge, MA
Introduction:
Neuroimaging and machine learning are opening up new opportunities in studying biological aging mechanisms. In this field, 'brain age gap' has emerged as promising MRI-based biomarker quantifying the deviation between an individual's biological and chronological age of the brain – an indicator of accelerated/decelerated aging. Here we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of brain age gap to discover associated genomic loci and to examine pleiotropic relationships with other complex traits, i.e., the links with mental and physical health.
Methods:
We present findings from the largest brain age GWAS to date, with genetic effects derived from up to 56,622 individuals. We estimate grey matter (GM), white matter (WM), and combined grey and white matter (GWM) brain age gap by applying supervised machine learning techniques to structural T1-weighted MRI scans. In a first step, we identify associated loci in a discovery sample of n = 32,634 UK Biobank individuals and replicate our findings in another n = 23,988 individuals. In a second step, we conduct a meta-analysis across discovery and replication cohort to discover additional loci and perform a broad range of GWAS follow-up analyses to prioritize relevant genes. Moreover, we compute genetic correlations with more than 1000 health traits using LD Score Regression, establish evidence for causal relationships via two-sample Mendelian Randomization, and use genetic effect size distribution analysis to estimate the degree of polygenicity. We make our analysis pipeline publicly available on GitHub: https://github.com/pjawinski/ukb_brainage
Results:
Our study demonstrates that brain age has a substantial genetic component, with heritability estimates (h2SNP) ranging from 23% to 29% (SE: 2.0%). In the discovery sample, we identify 25 associated loci, all showing sign concordance, and 19 achieving nominal significance in the replication sample. Our meta-analysis across both discovery and replication samples highlights 59 independently associated loci (40 novel). For the strongest signal at 17q21.31 (p = 9e-83), we prioritize MAPT encoding the tau protein central to Alzheimer's disease. Genetic correlations unveil relationships with several traits, including substance use (e.g., drinks per week), mental health (e.g., frequency of unenthusiasm), physical health (e.g., diabetes), and lifespan variables (e.g., mother's age at death). Using Mendelian Randomization analyses, we demonstrate a causal role of enhanced blood pressure and diabetes on accelerated brain aging. Genetic effect size distribution analyses suggest a relatively low degree of polygenicity with ~11.5k contributing variants.

Conclusions:
In conclusion, our study refines the genetic architecture of brain age gap and its implications for other health traits. We identify 59 variants (40 new) and prioritize plausible genes such as MAPT and APOC1 involved in neurodegenerative diseases, and CARF linked to premature senescence. The observed genomic signals unveil several enriched biological pathways, e.g., immune-system-related processes as well as the binding of small GTPases, prompting further mechanistic exploration.
Genetics:
Genetic Association Studies 1
Lifespan Development:
Aging 2
Neuroanatomy, Physiology, Metabolism and Neurotransmission:
Normal Development
Keywords:
Aging
Development
Machine Learning
Neurological
STRUCTURAL MRI
Other - brain aging; genetics; mental health
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Other
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Healthy subjects
Was this research conducted in the United States?
No
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Structural MRI
For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?
3.0T
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
SPM
Free Surfer
Provide references using APA citation style.
not applicable.
No