Influence of tACS on neural dynamics at a targeted frequency in SSVEP

Poster No:

25 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Nuri On1, Jeonghui Kim2, Chany Lee3, Do-Won Kim4

Institutions:

1CHONNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, Yeosu City, Jeollanam-do, 2CHONNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, Yeosu, Jeollanamdo, 3Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 4Chonnam National University, Yeosu, Jeollanam-do

First Author:

Nuri On  
CHONNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
Yeosu City, Jeollanam-do

Co-Author(s):

Jeonghui Kim  
CHONNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
Yeosu, Jeollanamdo
Chany Lee  
Korea Brain Research Institute
Daegu, Korea, Republic of
Do-Won Kim  
Chonnam National University
Yeosu, Jeollanam-do

Introduction:

Steady-state visual evoked potential based brain-computer interface (SSVEP-BCI) is one of the most extensively studied types of BCIs, utilizing the neural responses that elicited when an individual gazes at a visual stimulus flickering at a specific frequency. However, widespread adoption is hindered by individuals known as "SSVEP illiteracy" who lack the ability to respond to these visual stimuli. To address this issue, recent studies have shown that applying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the visual cortex can enhance SSVEP responses, but this enhancement is only observed in individuals with a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (Kim, 2019). This study investigates whether SSVEP responses can be enhanced at specific frequencies using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).

Methods:

A total of 24 participants (19 males, age: 22.70 ± 2.07) were recruited for the experiment. Each participant first recorded an initial SSVEP response before receiving tACS stimulation. SSVEP responses were recorded for 10 seconds while gazing at a flickering stimulus at 12 random frequencies, each presented 10 times. The frequency with the lowest SNR was chosen for tACS. tACS was applied for 20 minutes with a maximum current of 2 mA. Anodal electrodes were placed at O1, Oz, O2, and Pz; the cathodal electrode was at Fz. After tACS, SSVEP responses at 12 frequencies were recorded to assess the effects of tACS. All EEG recordings and tACS stimulation used a battery-driven current stimulator (Starstim R32, NeuroElectrics, Barcelona, Spain). All participants signed a written consent that was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Chonnam National University prior to their participation in the study (IRB No. 1040198-210708-HR-103-03).

Results:

A significant increase in absolute power was observed in the post-stimulation condition (0.706 ± 0.309) compared to the pre-stimulation condition (0.588 ± 0.246), whereas in the non-stimulation condition, absolute power was not significantly different between pre- (0.678 ± 0.228) and post- (0.708 ± 0.245) TACS. Similarly, SNR was significantly improved in the post-stimulation (1.377 ± 0.307) condition compared to pre-stimulation (0.213 ± 0.292), but no significant difference was found in the non-stimulation condition. [Figure 1]
Supporting Image: tACS_Figure1.png
   ·Changes in (a) absolute power and (b) SNR as stimulation condition
 

Conclusions:

This study provides compelling evidence that frequency-specific transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a viable method to enhance steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) responses, particularly at targeted stimulus frequencies. By applying tACS to the visual cortex at frequencies associated with the lowest initial signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), significant improvements in both absolute power and SNR of SSVEP responses were observed. These enhancements were specifically localized to the targeted frequencies, while non-stimulus frequencies remained unaffected, demonstrating the frequency-specific nature of tACS effects.

Brain Stimulation:

Non-invasive Electrical/tDCS/tACS/tRNS 1

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

EEG 2

Keywords:

Electroencephaolography (EEG)
Other - steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP); transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); spectral power; visual cortex

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Task-activation

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Healthy subjects

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

EEG/ERP

Provide references using APA citation style.

Kim, D.-W. et al., (2019) Can anodal transcranial direct current stimulation increase steady-state visual evoked potential responses? Journal of Korean Medical Science, 34(43), e285.

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No