Response of the right hemisphere to the binocular loss of the central vision – FBA & pRF results

Poster No:

2083 

Submission Type:

Late-Breaking Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Kamil Lipinski1, Marco Ninghetto2, Kamil Szulborski3, Jacek Szaflik3, Monika Ołdak3, Kalina Burnat2

Institutions:

1Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, mazovian, 2Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS, Warsaw, mazovian, 3Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, mazovian

First Author:

Kamil Lipinski  
Warsaw University of Technology
Warsaw, mazovian

Co-Author(s):

Marco Ninghetto  
Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS
Warsaw, mazovian
Kamil Szulborski  
Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, mazovian
Jacek Szaflik, Prof  
Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, mazovian
Monika Ołdak  
Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, mazovian
Kalina Burnat  
Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS
Warsaw, mazovian

Late Breaking Reviewer(s):

Jean Chen  
Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest
Toronto, Ontario
Stephanie Forkel, PhD  
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour
Nijmegen, Gelderland
Rosanna Olsen  
Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Academy for Research and Education
Toronto, Ontario

Introduction:

Macular degeneration (MD) is the leading cause of age-related vision loss, characterized by central retinal photoreceptor degeneration, resulting in reduced high-acuity vision and difficulties with reading and object recognition.

Previously, we reported a dorsal neuroplasticity response to central retinal lesions in an MD animal model (Burnat et al., 2017), confirmed by white matter degradation (Kozak et al., 2024). Here, we examined similar reorganization in juvenile MD, the Stargardt patients, with a homogeneous genetic background.

We predicted that population receptive field (pRF) mapping (Dumoulin et al., 2008) would show increased pRF size, reflecting reduced visual acuity. Additionally, we hypothesized that retinal degeneration in Stargardt patients would induce detectable white matter changes using Fixel-Based Analysis (FBA; Raffelt et al., 2017).

Methods:

Participants: 22 STDG patients with no interocular differences (9m/14f, mutation in 128-kb ABCA4 gene, 19-64 years (M =37.91; SD = 12.06) and 49 healthy participants (21m/26f, 20-63 years (M = 36.34; SD = 12.45). The mapping of the population receptive field size (pRF, Dumoulin & Wandell, 2008) was performed in V1-3 visual areas, separately for their dorsal and ventral subdivisions. Two diffusion-weighted shells with b-values 1000 and 2000, 50 directions, and five b0 images (no diffusion weighting), voxel size 2x2x2 mm, TR 9200 ms, TE 95 ms, GRAPPA were acquired on 3T MR Scanner. Diffusion Weighted Imaging data processing and Fixel Based Analysis (FBA) were performed using MRTrix 3 Software (Raffelt et al., 2017, Tournier et al., 2019). Fiber Cross-section, Fiber Density and combined measure of Fiber Density and Cross-section were calculated for each subject and then statistical analysis was performed using multiple contrast matrices. Segmentation of the brain tracts was performed using TractSeg tool (Wasserthal et al., 2018). To mask main parts of tracts for analysis, for each tract, among the voxels through which the tract passes at least once, the median number of streamlines passing through each voxel was calculated. A voxel was included in the tract mask if the number of streamlines passing through it was at least equal to the median value for that tract.
Supporting Image: processing.png
   ·Figure 1. Explanation of the processing pipeline.
 

Results:

FBA and pRF analyses demonstrated hemispheric asymmetry, with greater impairment in the right hemisphere. The voxel measures in STDG showed 9-16% decrease of the FC within right posterior thalamic radiation (Figure 2), 8-60% (mean 18% STD 8.9) in FDC and 4-44% (mean 8% STD 3) in FD. The four significant streamlines were entering the right ROIs V1d and V1v, V2v, V2d, V3v and V4. In the STGD group, right hemisphere pRF size within dorsal ROIs were significantly bigger at the central eccentricities covering their blind central visual field. To ensure the changes in tracts are connected strictly with STDG, we compared left vs right hemisphere in both groups separately and no differences were found.
Supporting Image: IMG_7084.png
   ·Figure 2. Right hemisphere, significant streamlines colored by direction (I, III, IV) and by the effect size expressed as a percentage of FC increase (II, V).
 

Conclusions:

Here, we present for the first time the unilateral reduction of right white matter tracts in due to the symmetrical loss of central retina in STDG patients and demonstrate how this reduction mirrors the asymmetrical voxel activations observed within the visual cortex. The pRF sizes in the dorsal and ventral regions of interest are differentially affected by binocular loss of central vision. The increase in pRF size within central eccentricities in the dorsal stream likely reflects the central increase in visual cortex receptive field size observed in animal models of central retinal damage (Giannikopoulos & Eysel, 2006). Furthermore, the right hemispheric asymmetry in white matter microstructure has also been noted in schizophrenia patients with persistent auditory verbal hallucinations (Li et al., 2025). This unilateral right-hemisphere response is consistent with the well-established understanding of right hemisphere dominance in attention deployment (Weintraub & Mesulam, 1987).

Disorders of the Nervous System:

Neurodevelopmental/ Early Life (eg. ADHD, autism) 2

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

Diffusion MRI

Perception, Attention and Motor Behavior:

Perception: Visual 1

Keywords:

Congenital
Cortex
Demyelinating
Perception
Plasticity
Tractography
Vision
Other - White matter imaging, FBA

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I am submitting this abstract as an original work to be reproduced. I am available to be the “source party” in an upcoming team and consent to have this work listed on the OSSIG website. I agree to be contacted by OSSIG regarding the challenge and may share data used in this abstract with another team.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Task-activation

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Patients

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Functional MRI
Diffusion MRI

For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?

3.0T

Which processing packages did you use for your study?

SPM
FSL
Other, Please list  -   MRTrix, TractSeg

Provide references using APA citation style.

1. Burnat K, Hu TT, Kossut M, Eysel UT, Arckens L. (2017). Plasticity Beyond V1: Reinforcement of Motion Perception upon Binocular Central Retinal Lesions in Adulthood. J Neurosci. 13;37(37):8989-8999.
2. Dumoulin, S. O., & Wandell, B. A. (2008). Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex. NeuroImage, 39(2), 647–660.
3. Kozak A, Ninghetto M, Wieteska M, Fiedorowicz M, Wełniak-Kamińska M, Kossowski B, Eysel UT, Arckens L, Burnat K. (2024). Visual training after central retinal loss limits structural white matter degradation: an MRI study. Behav Brain Funct.. 24;20(1):13.
4. Giannikopoulos, D. V., & Eysel, U. T. (2006). Dynamics and specificity of cortical map reorganization after retinal lesions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(28), 10805–10810.
5. Li J, He J, Ren H, Li C, Li Z, Chen X, He Y, Tang J. (2025). Hemispheric asymmetry of the white matter microstructure in schizophrenia patients with persistent auditory verbal hallucinations. Cereb Cortex. 5;35(2).
6.Raffelt, D. A., Tournier, J.-D., Smith, R. E., Vaughan, D. N., Jackson, G., Ridgway, G. R., & Connelly, A. (2017). Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis. NeuroImage, 144, 58–73.
7.Tournier, J.-D., Smith, R., Raffelt, D., Tabbara, R., Dhollander, T., Pietsch, M., Christiaens, D., Jeurissen, B., Yeh, C.-H., & Connelly, A. (2019). MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. NeuroImage, 202, 116137.
8. Wang, L., Mruczek, R. E. B., Arcaro, M. J., & Kastner, S. (2015). Probabilistic Maps of Visual Topography in Human Cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 25(10), 3911–3931.
9. Wasserthal, J., Neher, P., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2018). TractSeg—Fast and accurate white matter tract segmentation. NeuroImage, 183, 239–253.

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No