Neural Correlates of Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease with Hallucinations

Poster No:

252 

Submission Type:

Late-Breaking Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Lada Kohoutova1, Fosco Bernasconi2, Jevita Potheegadoo3, Olaf Blanke3

Institutions:

1EPFL, Geneva, Switzerland, 2EPFL, Geneva, GE, 3Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland

First Author:

Lada Kohoutova  
EPFL
Geneva, Switzerland

Co-Author(s):

Fosco Bernasconi  
EPFL
Geneva, GE
Jevita Potheegadoo  
Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
Geneva, Switzerland
Olaf Blanke  
Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
Geneva, Switzerland

Introduction:

Hallucinations are a common non-motor symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD). They range from minor hallucinations, including passage and presence hallucinations, and visual illusions, to well-structured hallucinations, and are linked to a more rapid cognitive decline (Bejr‐Kasem et al., 2021; Anang et al., 2014). To enable the study of hallucinations in controlled laboratory settings, our group has developed a robotic system that, via somatomotor conflict, induces presence hallucination-like symptoms, or in other words the false perception of someone else being nearby (Blanke et al., 2014). Notably, PD patients who experience hallucinations as one of their daily symptoms exhibit heightened sensitivity to this somatomotor conflict (Bernasconi et al., 2021). Our current study integrates behavioural data from the robot experiment with neuropsychological assessments (PD Cognitive Rating Scale; PD-CRS) and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI), to investigate neural correlates of cognitive impairment in PD patients with symptomatic hallucinations. Our results suggest that mainly the functional connectivity (FC) between subcortical (SBC) areas and the visual network (VN) is associated with both the sensitivity to the robot task and frontal subcortical cognitive scores in three subgroups of PD patients.

Methods:

Our dataset includes a total of 53 patients categorised into three groups through a clinical interview: no hallucinations (nH; n = 19), minor hallucinations (mH; n = 18), and complex, that is, a combination of minor and well-structured, hallucinations (xH; n = 16). All patients completed a set of neuropsychological tests, underwent an 8 min rs-fMRI session, and performed the somatomotor robot task outside the MRI. During the robot task, participants were instructed to move the front part of the robotic system while the back robot delivered a tactile stimulus on the participant's back with a 0 ms, 250 ms or 500 ms delay. There were 12 trials of each delay and after each trial participants were asked whether they experienced the sensation of someone nearby. We fitted a linear model in each individual to the mean of "yes" answers in each delay and used the slope of the regression in our further analyses. fMRI data were preprocessed, denoised, and parcellated into 265 regions based on a combination of the Schaefer (Schaefer et al., 2018) and Brainnetome (Fan et al., 2016) atlases, with periaqueductal grey and brainstem regions from previous studies (Beissner et al., 2014; Roy et al., 2014). Whole brain FC was obtained for each individual. To analyse the data, we performed a partial least squares correlation (PLSC) with the whole brain FC as the x-variable and robot responses, frontal subcortical cognitive scores of the PD-CRS, and the clinical group assignment as the y-variable. We ran a permutation test with 5,000 iterations to determine the significant latent components, and a bootstrap test with 10,000 samples to find features significantly contributing to those components.

Results:

The permutation test in the PLSC analysis revealed one significant latent component (LC1) explaining 96 % of covariance (p = 0.005). The bootstrap test showed that LC1 captured mainly the difference between mH and nH groups as well as the robot task sensitivity and frontal subcortical cognitive scores and their interactions with the mH vs. nH contrast (Fig. 1a). Associated significant loadings of FC were found mostly between SBC and VN and somatomotor (SMN) areas, between frontoparietal (FPN) and SMN, and between ventral attention and SMN (Fig. 1b).
Supporting Image: pdcog_ohbm25_fig.png
 

Conclusions:

Our findings revealed an interplay of mainly SBC-VN and SBC-SMN FC linked to cognitive impairment, somatomotor robot task sensitivity, and hallucinations in PD patients. This extends previous studies showing altered cortico-SBC FC in PD patients (Tang et al., 2022) and changes in FC between SMN, FPN and VN associated with hallucinations in PD patients (Baik et al., 2024; Bernasconi et al., 2021).

Disorders of the Nervous System:

Neurodegenerative/ Late Life (eg. Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s) 1

Higher Cognitive Functions:

Higher Cognitive Functions Other 2

Modeling and Analysis Methods:

Task-Independent and Resting-State Analysis

Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:

BOLD fMRI

Keywords:

FUNCTIONAL MRI
Other - Parkinson's disease, hallucinations, cognitive impairment

1|2Indicates the priority used for review

Abstract Information

By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.

I accept

The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information. Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:

I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.

Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.

Resting state

Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):

Patients

Was this research conducted in the United States?

No

Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.

Yes

Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.

Not applicable

Please indicate which methods were used in your research:

Functional MRI

For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?

3.0T

Which processing packages did you use for your study?

SPM

Provide references using APA citation style.

1. Anang, J. B., Gagnon, J. F., Bertrand, J. A., Romenets, S. R., Latreille, V., Panisset, M., ... & Postuma, R. B. (2014). Predictors of dementia in Parkinson disease: a prospective cohort study. Neurology, 83(14), 1253-1260.
2. Baik, K., Kim, Y. J., Park, M., Chung, S. J., Sohn, Y. H., Jeong, Y., & Lee, P. H. (2024). Functional Brain Networks of Minor and Well‐Structured Major Hallucinations in Parkinson's Disease. Movement Disorders, 39(2), 318-327.
3. Beissner, F., Schumann, A., Brunn, F., Eisenträger, D., & Bär, K. J. (2014). Advances in functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brainstem. Neuroimage, 86, 91-98.
4. Bejr‐Kasem, H., Sampedro, F., Marín‐Lahoz, J., Martínez‐Horta, S., Pagonabarraga, J., & Kulisevsky, J. (2021). Minor hallucinations reflect early gray matter loss and predict subjective cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease. European Journal of Neurology, 28(2), 438-447.
5. Bernasconi, F., Blondiaux, E., Potheegadoo, J., Stripeikyte, G., Pagonabarraga, J., Bejr-Kasem, H., ... & Blanke, O. (2021). Robot-induced hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease depend on altered sensorimotor processing in fronto-temporal network. Science Translational Medicine, 13(591), eabc8362.
6. Blanke, O., Pozeg, P., Hara, M., Heydrich, L., Serino, A., Yamamoto, A., ... & Rognini, G. (2014). Neurological and robot-controlled induction of an apparition. Current Biology, 24(22), 2681-2686.
7. Fan, L., Li, H., Zhuo, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Chen, L., ... & Jiang, T. (2016). The human brainnetome atlas: a new brain atlas based on connectional architecture. Cerebral cortex, 26(8), 3508-3526.
8. Roy, M., Shohamy, D., Daw, N., Jepma, M., Wimmer, G. E., & Wager, T. D. (2014). Representation of aversive prediction errors in the human periaqueductal gray. Nature neuroscience, 17(11), 1607-1612.
9. Schaefer, A., Kong, R., Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Zuo, X. N., Holmes, A. J., ... & Yeo, B. T. (2018). Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Cerebral cortex, 28(9), 3095-3114.
10. Tang, S., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Chau, S. W., Chan, J. W., Chu, W. C., ... & Wing, Y. K. (2022). Large-scale network dysfunction in α-Synucleinopathy: A meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity. EBioMedicine, 77.

UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank Waiver Form

I attest that I currently live, work, or study in a country on the UNESCO Institute of Statistics and World Bank List of Low and Middle Income Countries list provided.

No