Poster No:
1809
Submission Type:
Late-Breaking Abstract Submission
Authors:
Jason Webster1, Ali Shojaie1, Yiqin Shen1, Tung Le2, Emily Ragaglia1, Marika Bogdani1, Amanda Kirkland1, Christine Mac Donald1, Caitlin Latimer1, C. Dirk Keene1, Thomas Grabowski1
Institutions:
1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2ADRC, Seattle, WA
First Author:
Co-Author(s):
Late Breaking Reviewer(s):
Casey Paquola
Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-7, Forschungszentrum Jülich
Jülich, NA
Introduction:
The structural, cellular, and biomolecular research necessary for a mechanistic understanding of neuroscience relies on brain tissue collected according to a brain sampling protocol (BSP) and preserved in biorepositories. These analyses are crucial for assessing the validity of research in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias. The University of Washington BioRepository and Integrated Neuropathology (BRaIN) Laboratory has developed an extensive BSP for brain preparation, sampling, characterization, and storage. The digital BSP atlas uses a neuroimaging framework to create a 3D representation of this BSP to advance the tissue request process, augment biorepository workflows, generate scientific visualizations, and provide a link to neuroimaging data and analysis methods.
Methods:
Virtual neuropathology was performed according to the BRaIN lab BSP using the Montreal Neurological Institute and International Consortium on Brain Mapping 2009b Nonlinear Asymmetric Brain Template. Brain extraction, segmentation, and slicing were precisely replicated using FreeSurfer, FMRIB's Software Library (FSL), and custom Python/R scripts. Virtual tissue sampling was performed by the Lead Tissue Procurement Technician and a board-certified neuropathologist in Figma, a collaborative cloud-based platform with an intuitive dynamic interface. Data were exported in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format and processed in Python to create the 3D digital BSP atlas.
Results:
The Digital BSP Atlas provides volumetric labels for all routinely collected fixed-tissue samples in the BRaIN lab BSP and incorporates standard neuroinformatics conventions for compatibility with freely available software including FSL, MRICroGL, and FreeSurfer.
Conclusions:
The digital BSP atlas provides an explicit spatial representation of the BSP, enabling researchers to more efficiently locate, reference, and utilize postmortem samples. Implementing the BSP with modern neuroinformatics conventions provides a highly portable, quantitative reference that facilitates interdisciplinary collaboration, dynamic visualization, figure generation, protocol optimization, and integration with in-vivo neuroimaging. Ongoing extensions of this work include the development of neuropathology sampling training software and a flexible interface to identify corresponding samples from free-form neuroscience terms.
Modeling and Analysis Methods:
Methods Development 2
Neuroinformatics and Data Sharing:
Brain Atlases 1
Novel Imaging Acquisition Methods:
Anatomical MRI
Keywords:
Atlasing
Brainstem
Cerebellum
Cortex
Informatics
MRI
Segmentation
STRUCTURAL MRI
1|2Indicates the priority used for review
By submitting your proposal, you grant permission for the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) to distribute your work in any format, including video, audio print and electronic text through OHBM OnDemand, social media channels, the OHBM website, or other electronic publications and media.
I accept
The Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG) is introducing a reproducibility challenge for OHBM 2025. This new initiative aims to enhance the reproducibility of scientific results and foster collaborations between labs. Teams will consist of a “source” party and a “reproducing” party, and will be evaluated on the success of their replication, the openness of the source work, and additional deliverables. Click here for more information.
Propose your OHBM abstract(s) as source work for future OHBM meetings by selecting one of the following options:
I do not want to participate in the reproducibility challenge.
Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Other
Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Healthy subjects
Was this research conducted in the United States?
Yes
Are you Internal Review Board (IRB) certified?
Please note: Failure to have IRB, if applicable will lead to automatic rejection of abstract.
Not applicable
Were any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel?
NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Were any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel?
NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable
Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Structural MRI
Postmortem anatomy
Which processing packages did you use for your study?
FSL
Free Surfer
Provide references using APA citation style.
not applicable
No